دانلود کتاب A Pluralist Theory of Age Discrimination

فهرست مطالب :

Acknowledgements\nContents\nTable of Cases\nTable of Legislation\n1. Introduction\n I. Age as a Protected Characteristic\n II. The Value of a Theory of Age Discrimination\n III. Rejecting Unitary Theories of Discrimination\n IV. Towards a Pluralist Theory of Age Discrimination\n V. The Scope of this Book\n VI. Possible Objections to Courts and Tribunals Using a Theory of Age Discrimination in Adjudication\n VII. The Reflective Equilibrium Method\n VIII. Criticism of Reflective Equilibrium\n IX. The Limitations of Reflective Equilibrium\n X. The Structure of this Book\n2. The Legal Context\n I. The Structure of Age Discrimination Law\n II. Proportionality as Moral Reasoning\n III. The Possible Implications on Age Discrimination Law of the UK Exiting the European Union\n IV. The Proportionality Test in UK Age Discrimination Cases\n V. Conclusion\n3. Equality Principles\n I. A Starting Point for Understanding Equality\n II. Strict Equality of Outcome\n III. Equality of Opportunity\n IV. Choice and Moral Responsibility\n V. Problems with Equality of Opportunity\n VI. Social Equality\n VII. Equality of What?\n VIII. Conclusion\n4. The Wrongs of Discrimination\n I. Rejecting Unitary Theories of Discrimination\n II. Explaining the Wrong of Discrimination\n III. Conclusion\n5. Forming a Pluralist Theory of Age Discrimination\n I. A Background Theory of Age and Ageing\n II. The Efficiency Value of Age-Based Social Organisation\n III. Age Discrimination and Equality of Opportunity\n IV. Age Discrimination and Social Equality\n V. Autonomy and Age Discrimination\n VI. Age Discrimination and Disrespect\n VII. Conclusion\n6. Legislative History of Age Discrimination Law and Its Relevance to Interpreting and Applying the Equality Act 2010\n I. The Legality of Using Legislative History in Adjudication\n II. Legislative History of Age Discrimination Law\n III. Using the Legislative History as Aids in Adjudication\n IV. Evaluating the Approach to Age Discrimination Revealed in the Legislative History\n V. Conclusion\n7. The Pluralist Theory of Age Discrimination and Age Discrimination Claims\n I. A Preliminary Account of How the Pluralist Theory of Age Discrimination can Assist Age Discrimination Claims\n II. Visual Representation of the Four Stages of Settling Age Discrimination Claims\n III. Comparing and Contrasting the Approach of the Pluralist Theory of Age Discrimination to the Approach Adopted by the UK Cases\n IV. Conclusion\n8. Healthcare Rationing and the Pluralist Theory of Age Discrimination\n I. NICE\'s Anti-discrimination Duties under the Equality Act 2010\n II. NICE\'s Use of the QALY Method can Engage the Indirect Age Discrimination Provisions\n III. The Proportionality of the QALY Method\n IV. Conclusion\n9. Conclusion\n I. Summary of the Pluralist Theory of Age Discrimination\n II. How the Pluralist Theory Assists in Age Discrimination Claims\n III. The Role of Moral Reasoning in Adjudication\n IV. How I Arrived at the Pluralist Theory of Age Discrimination\n V. The Value and Limitations of Reflective Equilibrium as a Method for Investigating Legal Issues\n VI. The Implications for the Pluralist Theory of Age Discrimination for Understanding the Concept of Discrimination More Generally\n VII. The Usefulness of the Pluralist Theory of Age Discrimination in Relation to Systems Other than the UK\n VIII. The Value of the Pluralist Theory of Age Discrimination for Identifying which Grounds should be Protected under Discrimination Law\n IX. The Pluralist Theory of Age Discrimination and Political Debate\nBibliography\nIndex