دانلود کتاب Advances in Experimental Moral Psychology

فهرست مطالب :

Cover\nHalf-title\nTitle\nCopyright\nContents\nNotes on Contributors\nExperimental Moral Psychology: An Introduction\n Moral persons\n Moral groundings\n Measuring morality\n Conclusion\n References\nPart 1 Moral Persons\n 1 The Character in Competence\n Person perception and moral character\n Competence as long-term other-orientation\n New direction for moral cognition\n Conclusion\n Note\n References\n 2 Spoken Words Reveal Selfish Motives: An Individual Difference Approach to Moral Motivation\n Selfish or moral? A paradox\n Moral hypocrisy\n Moral is as moral does?\n Limitations of self-report inventories\n Objectivity\n Expedience\n The revealing nature of the spoken word\n Motives in stories\n How to spot a hypocrite: Toward an expedient, objective measure\n Hypothesis 1: Projected moral motives reveal selfish general tendency\n Hypothesis 2: Projected moral motives predict moral behavior\n Conclusion\n Notes\n References\n 3 Is the Glass of Kindness Half Full or Half Empty? Positive and Negative Reactions to Others’ Expressions of Virtue\n The two sides of human prosociality\n The half empty glass of kindness: When virtuous others are suspected and derogated\n A half full glass of kindness: When virtuous others become partners, saints, and heroes\n Concluding remarks\n Note\n References\n 4 What are the Bearers of Virtues?\n Virtues as dispositional properties\n The subjunctive conditional analysis\n Woulda, coulda, shoulda\n The psychology of dispositions\n Asocial situational influences\n Social influences\n Revising the metaphysics of virtue\n Notes\n References\n 5 The Moral Behavior of Ethicists and the Power of Reason\n Part 1: Our empirical studies\n Missing library books\n Peer ratings\n Voting rates\n Courtesy at philosophy conferences\n APA free riding\n Responsiveness to student emails\n Self-reported attitudes and behavior\n Self-reported attitude and behavior: Eating meat\n Self-reported attitude and behavior: Charity\n Conclusion\n Part 2: Possible explanations\n The rational tail view\n Narrow principles\n Reasoning might lead one to behave more permissibly but no better\n Compensation for deficient intuitions\n Rationally driven moral improvement plus toxic rationalization in equal measure\n Conclusion\n Notes\n References\nPart 2 Moral Groundings\n 6 Pollution and Purity in Moral and Political Judgment\n Disgust and moral judgment: Three claims\n Why disgust?\n The behavioral immune system and social attitudes\n Disease risk and attitudes toward the obese and disabled\n Disgust and attitudes toward homosexuals\n Disease risk and attitudes toward foreigners\n Other sociopolitical attitudes\n The behavioral immune system and moral judgment\n Which moral violations elicit disgust?\n Induced disgust and harsher moral judgment\n The effects of cleanliness on moraland political judgment\n Disgusting but permissible actions\n Conclusion\n Note\n References\n 7 Selective Debunking Arguments, Folk Psychology, and Empirical Moral Psychology\n Some framing questions\n Disgust and moral justification\n The shape of the argument: Selective debunking\n Conclusion\n Notes\n References\n 8 The Psychological Foundations of Moral Conviction\n Measurement and operationalization\n Universalism and objectivism\n Motivation and behavior\n Emotion\n The authority independence hypothesis\n The nonconformity hypothesis\n Conclusion\n Notes\n References\n 9 How Different Kinds of Disagreement Impact Folk Metaethical Judgments\n Study 1\n Method\n Results\n Discussion\n Study 2\n Method\n Results\n Discussion\n Study 3\n Method\n Results\n Discussion\n Study 4\n Method\n Results\n Discussion\n Study 5\n Method\n Results\n Discussion\n General discussion\n Notes\n References\n 10 Exploring Metaethical Commitments: Moral Objectivity and Moral Progress\n Recent work on metaethical beliefs\n Moral objectivity\n Moral progress\n Belief in a just world\n Method\n Participants\n Materials and procedure\n Moral progress and belief in a just world measures\n Results\n Individual measures\n Relationships between metaethical commitment measures\n General discussion\n Notes\n References\n 11 Agent Versus Appraiser Moral Relativism: An Exploratory Study\n Moral relativism\n Agent versus appraiser moral relativism\n Importance of the agent-appraiser distinction\n Previous evidence for folk moral relativism\n Method\n Participants\n Materials and design\n Results\n Discussion\n Note\n References\nPart 3 Measuring Morality\n 12 Know Thy Participant: The Trouble with Nomothetic Assumptions in Moral Psychology\n Operationalizing “Morality” — An introduction to the problem\n Comparing the two approaches\n Third-person disadvantage: Poor construct validity\n Assessing a different construct\n First-person disadvantage: Complexity and impracticality\n A combined first- and third-person operationalization\n Examples of the mixed approach\n Conclusion\n Notes\n References\nIndex