دانلود کتاب Christ’s Humanity in Current and Ancient Controversy: Fallen or Not?

فهرست مطالب :

Cover\nHalf-title\nTitle\nCopyright\nContents\nAbbreviations\nAcknowledgements\nIntroduction: The Falling Out Over Fallenness\n 0.1 Rationale, structure, and subjects of this study\n 0.2 Scholarly antecedents and contributions of this study\n 0.3 Overview of this study\n 0.4 Historical setting of the current debate\n1. The Rise and Progress of the Fallenness View among Select Modern Theologians\n 1.1 Heather and ‘ heresy’: Edward Irving\n 1.1.1 Irving on Christ’s fallen flesh: Distinctions and definitions\n 1.1.2 Irving’s support for his doctrine\n 1.2 Revolutionizing Christology: Karl Barth\n 1.2.1 Tradition, scripture, and theological reasoning\n 1.2.2 Sinful flesh and salvation\n 1.2.3 The ontology of the incarnation\n 1.2.4 A glance backward and forward\n 1.3 Theologian of mediation: Thomas F. Torrance\n 1.3.1 Torrance’s early Christology\n 1.3.2 Christology after Auburn\n 1.3.3 Appeal to scripture\n 1.3.4 Critical retrieval of tradition\n 1.4 The world, the flesh, and the Spirit: Colin Gunton\n 1.4.1 A fallen network\n 1.4.2 Flesh and Spirit\n 1.4.3 Renewing the world\n 1.4.4 A second glance backward and forward\n 1.5 Broadening consensus: Thomas Weinandy\n 1.5.1 Conceiving sinful flesh aright\n 1.5.2 The testimony of the New Testament\n 1.5.3 The testimony of tradition\n 1.5.4 Weinandy’s contributions\n Conclusion\n2. The Defence of the Unfallenness View among Select Modern Theologians\n 2.1 Exposing Irving’s errings: Marcus Dods\n 2.1.1 Dods’s doctrinal logic\n 2.1.2 Dods’s scriptural support\n 2.1.3 Dods’s patristic support\n 2.2 Descent and development: A. B. Bruce\n 2.2.1 Bruce’s agenda and axioms\n 2.2.2 Christ’s humiliation in historical theology\n 2.2.3 Christ’s unfallen mortality, temptations, and infirmities\n 2.2.4 Bruce’s evolving explanation of flesh and sin\n 2.3 Catalyst for fallenness: H. R. Mackintosh\n 2.3.1 The Doctrine of the Person of Jesus Christ\n 2.3.2 The Christian Experience of Forgiveness\n 2.3.3 Types of Modern Theology\n 2.3.4 Taking stock of transition\n 2.4 The importance of image: Philip E. Hughes\n 2.4.1 Humanity made and marred in God’s image\n 2.4.2 Humanity restored by God’s image\n 2.4.3 Patristic and biblical support\n 2.5 Fallacious fallenness: Donald Macleod\n 2.5.1 Issues of interpretation\n 2.5.2 Faults in reasoning\n Conclusion\n3. The Greek Fathers on the Fallenness or Unfallenness of Christ’s Humanity\n 3.1 Theology’s Trailblazer: Irenaeus\n 3.1.1 Creation and Fall in the divine economy\n 3.1.2 Salvation through recapitulation\n 3.1.3 Christ’s flesh and the Fall\n 3.1.4 Christ’s flesh and death\n 3.2 Defending the incarnate God: Athanasius\n 3.2.1 The Word and his flesh\n 3.2.2 Pseudo(?)-Athanasian writings\n 3.3 ‘ The unassumed is the unhealed’: Gregory Nazianzen\n 3.3.1 The mind of Christ\n 3.3.2 The epithets of Christ\n 3.4 Imagining incarnation: Gregory Nyssen\n 3.4.1 Srawley’s thesis\n 3.4.2 A response to Srawley\n 3.5 ‘ Seal of the Fathers’: Cyril of Alexandria\n 3.5.1 Christ’s ‘ fallen body’\n 3.5.2 Christ’s life-giving flesh\n Conclusion\n4. The Latin Fathers on the Fallenness or Unfallenness of Christ’s Humanity\n 4.1 Pioneer in the West: Tertullian\n 4.1.1 Tertullian’s anthropology\n 4.1.2 Christ’s relation to sin and death\n 4.2 The passionlessness of the Christ: Hilary of Poitiers\n 4.2.1 Defence of Christ’s human impassibility\n 4.2.2 Pauline exegesis\n 4.3 The passions of the Christ: Ambrose\n 4.3.1 Incarnation as identification with our injured state\n 4.3.2 Incarnation as rectification of our fleshly state\n 4.4 Settler of the West’s opinion: Augustine\n 4.4.1 Humanity: Perfection, defection, infection\n 4.4.2 Christ: Originally sinless, actually sinless, vicariously sinful\n 4.5 Chalcedon and context: Leo the Great\n 4.5.1 The Christmas sermons\n 4.5.2 The Paschal sermons\n 4.5.3 From the First to the Second Tome\n Conclusion\n5. The Fleshing Out of the Findings\n 5.1 Righting history: The modern debaters on the fathers\n 5.1.1 Edward Irving\n 5.1.2 Karl Barth\n 5.1.3 T. F. Torrance and Colin Gunton\n 5.1.4 Th omas Weinandy\n 5.1.5 The unfallenness theologians\n 5.1.6 Summary of fi ndings concerning historical claims\n 5.2 Righting theology: Taxonomy\n 5.2.1 Sykes’taxonomy\n 5.2.2 Hastings’taxonomy\n 5.2.3 A Sykes-Hastings taxonomy\n 5.3 Righting theology: Terminology\n 5.3.1 ‘Assumed’\n 5.3.2 ‘Unfallen’\n 5.3.3 ‘Fallen’\n 5.3.4 ‘Sinful’\n 5.3.5 ‘Sinless’\n 5.3.6 A case study as a summary\n 5.4 Further implications\n 5.4.1 Mariology\n 5.4.2 Hamartiology\n 5.4.3 Sanctification\n 5.4.4 Bibliology\n 5.5 A final word\nAppendix: Edward Irving’s Patristic Sources\nBibliography\nIndex