فهرست مطالب :
CRITICAL APPROACHES TO HARM REDUCTION CONFLICT, INSTITUTIONALIZATION, (DE-)POLITICIZATION, AND DIRECT ACTION
CRITICAL APPROACHES TO HARM REDUCTION CONFLICT, INSTITUTIONALIZATION, (DE-)POLITICIZATION, AND DIRECT ACTION
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION
REFERENCES
PART ONE: CRITICAL HARM REDUCTION POLICY: FROM OPPOSITIONAL SOCIAL MOVEMENT TO INSTITUTIONALIZED PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY
Chapter 1 WHO NEEDS NALOXONE?
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODOLOGY
Background/Context: Placing Naloxone within the Politics of Needs Interpretation
Results: The Politics of Needs Interpretation in Identifying the Limits of Risk and Harm
Discussion: Professionalizing Harm Reduction: Social Movements, Research Communities, Policy and Advocacy Networks
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
Chapter 2 LOW THRESHOLD METHADONE PROGRAM: 13 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE IN PORTUGAL
ABSTRACT
1. HARM REDUCTION
2. LOW THRESHOLD METHADONE PROGRAMS
3. THE CONTEXT OF THE DRUG ABUSE PROBLEM IN LISBON
4. THE ARES DO PINHAL INSTITUTION
5. LOW THRESHOLD METHADONE PROGRAMS IN LISBON
6. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS
6.1. Base Structures of the LTMP-Lx
Support Offices (GAFs)
Proximity Mobile Units (UMPs)
Mobile Care Unit (UMC)
The LTMP-Lx Support Vehicle
6.2. Brief Description of the LTMP-Lx Function
Syringe Exchange and Condom Distribution Program
7. PARTNERSHIPS
8. INTERVENTION IMPACT OVER 13 YEARS
8.1. Health Impact
8.2. Public Healthcare
8.3. Behaviours/Social Experiences
8.4. Degree of Satisfaction and Impact of the Program
8.5. Admissions and Referrals in LTMP-Lx
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
Chapter 3 LAW ENFORCEMENT AND PUBLIC HEALTH: HOW NORTH CAROLINA BECAME A LEADER IN HARM REDUCTION POLICY CHANGE
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
Harm Reduction: Policy and Methodological Challenges
Why Policy Is Needed to Reduce Overdose Fatalities
North Carolina: Political Context
Legislative Advocacy: A Response to Overdose Fatalities in North Carolina
Law Enforcement Officer Training and Harm Reduction Pragmatism
METHOD
Data Collection
RESULTS
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
PART TWO: CRITICAL HARM REDUCTION PRACTICE: AUTONOMY, IDEOLOGY, AND EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTIONS
Chapter 4 POWER, POLITICS AND THE PRODUCTION OF HARM: A CRITICAL LOOK AT THE INTERSECTING, YET UNEQUAL, ROLES OF SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE, POWER, AND POLITICS IN THE PROVISION OF HARM REDUCTION SERVICES FOR PEOPLE WHO SMOKE CRACK
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
THE ACTION – POWERFUL POLITICS
THE REACTION: COLLECTIVE RESISTANCE
THE IMPACT: THE PRODUCTION OF HARM
REFERENCES
Chapter 5 RETHINKING HARM REDUCTION AND PREGNANCY: A STUDY OF WOMEN’S EXPECTATIONS AND EXPERIENCES OF SPECIALIST MATERNITY CARE AND OPIATE SUBSTITUTION TREATMENT
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
THE MULTIPLE AND CONFLICTING AIMS OF SPECIALIST MATERNITY CARE
METHODS
WOMEN’S EXPECTATIONS AND EXPERIENCES OF SPECIALIST MATERNITY CARE AND OST
ADDRESSING THE BARRIERS TO CARE IN SPECIALIST MATERNITY SERVICES
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
Chapter 6 “AND THE WORLD'S ALRIGHT WITH ME”: HARM REDUCTION AND SURVIVAL AT BLOCKORAMA
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
REFERENCES
Chapter 7 WHAT’S GLITTER GOT TO DO WITH IT?: RE-IMAGINING HARM REDUCTION, YOUTH DECISION-MAKING, AND THE POLITICS OF YOUTH ENGAGEMENT
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND/CONTEXT
Empower: An Arts-Based Harm Reduction and HIV Prevention Program for Youth by Youth
Methodology (Our Approach)
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Youth Engagement and Harm Reduction: Supporting Youth-Led Spaces in Practice
Section 1: Accountable Programs for Youth by Youth
Section 2: Collective Capacity-Building
Section 3: Accessible and Safe(r) Spaces
Section 4: Worker’s Approaches
Section 5: Organizational and Funding Policy
Section 6: Re-Imagining Harm Reduction, Decision-Making and Youth Engagement
CONCLUSION
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
REFERENCES
PART THREE: CRITICAL HARM REDUCTION PHILOSOPHY: DEPOLITICIZATION, DIRECT ACTION, DRUG/SERVICE USERS’ EXPERIENTIAL KNOWLEDGE
Chapter 8 EVERYTHING ABOUT THEM, WITHOUT THEM: SEX WORK AND THE HARMS OF MISRECOGNITION
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: HARM REDUCTION AND SEX WORK
BACKGROUND: SITUATING SEX WORK AND HARM REDUCTION ON “THE ROCK”2
METHODOLOGY: RESEARCHING WITH HARD-TO-REACH POPULATIONS
THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK: MISRECOGNITION AND THE EXPANSION OF HARM REDUCTION PRINCIPLES TO SEX WORK
RESULTS: (MIS)RECOGNITION, IDEOLOGY, AND RESISTANCE
Misrecognition, Radical Feminism, and Sex Work
Current Canadian Context: Ideological Harms
COLONIZING IDENTITIES: THE CANADIAN CONTEXT AND POSTCOLONIALISM
CONCLUSION: RECOGNITION AS HARM REDUCTION
REFERENCES
Chapter 9 EXPANDING THE MISSION OF HARM REDUCTION: A PUBLIC HEALTH POPULATION AND ITS MEMBERS’ PERSPECTIVES TOWARDS HEALTH
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
BACKGROUND
Genealogy of a Risk Category
Suspicions and Concerns (1984-1985)
Surveillance and Differentiation (1986)
Behaviour Change and Self-Advocacy (1987-1988)
Harm Reduction
METHODS
RESULTS
Narratives of Risk
Narratives of Illness
LIMITATIONS
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
Chapter 10 RECOGNITION, EXPLOITATION, OR BOTH?: A ROUNDTABLE ON PEER LABOUR AND HARM REDUCTION
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
DISTINCTIONS AND TENSIONS BETWEEN PEER AND BY-AND-FOR MODELS
WORKING CONDITIONS AND WORKPLACE PRACTICE
SELF-MANAGEMENT, AUTONOMY, AND LABOUR ORGANIZING
PROFESSIONALIZATION
INSTITUTIONS, PUBLIC HEALTH, AND INSTITUTIONALIZATION
GLOSSARY
REFERENCES
Chapter 11 HARM REDUCTION HIPSTERS: SOCIO-SPATIAL-POLITICAL DISPLACEMENT AND THE GENTRIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEALTH
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: THE HIPSTER-IZATION OF HARM REDUCTION
METHODOLOGY: ETHNOGRAPHIC APPROACHES TO ADDICTION, CONTEMPORARY HIPSTERDOM, AND THE DEPOLITICIZATION OF INSTITUTIONALIZED PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY
DISPLACEMENT #1: SOCIAL CLASS, USER SPACE, AND HIPSTER GENTRIFICATION
DISPLACEMENT #2: THE DISPLACEMENT OF DIRECT USER INVOLVEMENT IN HARM REDUCTION PRACTICE
DISPLACEMENT #3: THE GENTRIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEALTH
CONCLUSION: QUESTIONING RESEARCH MOTIVES/ALLIANCES AND (RE)MAPPING UNEQUAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF POWER IN A FLUID LANDSCAPE OF CONTROL
REFERENCES
ABOUT THE EDITORS
ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTORS
PART ONE: CRITICAL HARM REDUCTION POLICY: FROM OPPOSITIONAL SOCIAL MOVEMENT TO INSTITUTIONALIZED PUBLIC HEALTH POLICY
PART TWO: CRITICAL HARM REDUCTION PRACTICE: AUTONOMY, IDEOLOGY, AND EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTIONS
PART THREE: CRITICAL HARM REDUCTION PHILOSOPHY: DEPOLITICIZATION, DIRECT ACTION, AND DRUG/SERVICE USERS’ EXPERIENTIAL KNOWLEDGE
INDEX