دانلود کتاب Everything, more or less: A defence of generality relativism (Oxford Philosophical Monographs)

فهرست مطالب :

Cover\nEverything, More or Less: A Defence of Generality Relativism\nCopyright\nDedication\nPreface\nContents\nAcknowledgements\n1: Absolutism and Relativism\n 1.1 Absolutism\n 1.2 The argument from sortal restriction\n 1.3 The argument from metaphysical realism\n 1.4 The argument from indefinite extensibility\n Collection\n The russell reductio\n Interpretation\n The williamson–russell reductio\n The naivety rejoinder\n 1.5 The objection from mysteriousness\n 1.6 The objection from ineffability\n2: Russell, Zermelo, and Dummett\n 2.1 Self-reproductive processes and classes\n A template for paradox\n Burali-forti’s paradox\n Russell’s paradox\n Russell’s Lesson\n Against a comprehensive totality\n 2.2 The vicious-circle principle\n New grounds for relativism?\n The vicious-circle principle and ramified type theory\n Against ramification\n Russell’s reconciliation\n Interpreting second-order quantifiers\n 2.3 Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory\n Zermelo’s axiomatic approach\n Avoiding Russell’s paradox\n 2.4 The open-ended hierarchy\n The russell reductio\n The iterative conception of set\n Stage 0\n Stage α+1\n Stage λ\n Quasi-categoricity and the open-ended hierarchy\n 2.5 Indefinite extensibility\n The Dummettian argument\n The naivety rejoinder redux\n3: Quantifiers\n 3.1 MT-semantics for the language of set theory\n 3.2 MT-semantics for the language of generalized quantifiers\n The language of generalized quantifiers: syntax\n The language of generalized quantifiers: MT-semantics\n 3.3 Intended MT-interpretations?\n 3.4 P-semantics for the language of set theory\n 3.5 SP-semantics for the language of generalized quantifiers\n The language of generalized quantifiers: SP-semantics\n Interpreting superplural quantifiers\n 3.6 Semantics for Quineans\n The Williamson–Russell paradox\n Semantic optimism\n Whither Quinean absolutism?\n4: Restrictionism and Expansionism\n 4.1 Domains and universes\n 4.2 Restrictionism\n The indexical account\n Tacit nominal variables\n Pragmatic restriction\n Contextual restrictionism\n 4.3 The objection from semantic theorizing\n 4.4 Expansionism\n Procedural postulationism\n Interpretational expansionism\n The objection from creationism\n The objection from crypto-restrictionism\n The objection from semantic theorizing\n 4.5 The objection from kind-generalizations\n Kind-generalizations\n An intensional gap?\n A hyperintensional gap?\n AvoidingWilliamson’s regress\n Expressive issues revisited\n5: Schemas\n 5.1 The objection from ineffability\n Absolutism stated\n Is relativism self-defeating?\n 5.2 Open-ended schemas\n 5.3 Relativism schematized\n 5.4 Systematic ambiguity\n 5.5 The objection from side-conditions\n6: Modal Operators\n 6.1 Modal generality\n Beyond schematic generality\n Non-circumstantial modality\n Interpretational modality: a bimodal account\n 6.2 Modalization: first-order theories\n Invariance and Mirroring\n 6.3 Modalization: plural theories\n Adding plural resources\n Indefinite extensibility\n Relativism stated\n 6.4 Set theory for relativists\n The iterative conception: a bimodal axiomatization\n Linnebo’s unimodal axiomatization\n 6.5 Objections from unintelligibility\n The objection fromKripke semantics\n The objection from Kaplanian monsters\n 6.6 Hybrid relativism\n7: Russell Reductio Redux\n 7.1 The schematic argument\n 7.2 The modal argument\n 7.3 Uncollectability\n The Zermellian hierarchy and the Cantorian universe\n Option 1: zermellian relativism\n Option 2: cantorian absolutism\n Russell’s and Burali-Forti’s paradox revisited\n Limitation of size\n The iterative conception\n 7.4 Instability\n Option 3: third-way absolutism\n Restricted quantifiers\n Urelements\n 7.5 Non-comprehensibility\n The extended modal language\n The bimodal argument\n Option 1a: hybrid zermellian relativism\n Option 1b: thorough-going zermellian relativism\n Explaining non-comprehensibility\n8: How Universes Expand\n 8.1 The explanatory challenge\n 8.2 The Quantification Question\n McGee’s strategy\n Community Q: syntax\n Semantic assumptions\n Patterns of use\n Community Q: use\n A metasemantic assumption\n An answer to the Quantification Question\n 8.3 Assumptions\n Semantic assumptions\n The metasemantic assumption\n 8.4 The Expansion Question\n Community E: syntax\n Semantic assumptions\n Trans-language patterns of use\n Community E: use\n A metasemantic assumption\n An answer to the Expansion Question\n 8.5 Idealization\n Community E*\n Accommodation\n 8.6 Closing summary\nAppendix A: Logic\n A.1 Plural logic\n The first-order language\n The plural language\n Metalinguistic abbreviations\n Interpreting the plural language\n Model theory\n Proof theory\n A.2 Sorted plural logic\n The two-sorted plural language\n Model theory\n Proof theory\n A.3 Modal plural logic\n Proof theory\n Derived modal axioms\nAppendix B: Modalization\n B.1 Modalized invariance\n B.2 Mirroring\n B.3 Inextensibility\n B.4 Flattening\nAppendix C: Set Theory\n C.1 Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory\n Pure set theory\n Impure set theory\n C.2 Interpreting set theory, part I\n Empty Set, Pairing, Union, Separation, and Powerset\n Foundation and Regularity\n The Rank Theorem\n C.3 Kripke normal form\n C.4 Interpreting set theory, part II\n The Axiom of Choice\n Infinity and Replacement\nBibliography\nIndex