دانلود کتاب How to Achieve Defence Cooperation in Europe?: The Subregional Approach

فهرست مطالب :

Front Cover\nHow to Achieve Defence Cooperation in Europe?: The Subregional Approach\nCopyright information\nTable of contents\nList of figures\nList of abbreviations\nPreface\n1 Introduction\n Scholarship on defence cooperation in Europe\n The argument\n Key concepts\n Multinational defence cooperation (MDC) in Europe\n Defence Policy Communities (DPC)\n Theoretical framework\n Factors that are needed to establish MDCs in Europe successfully\n 1. The existence of the European security community\n 2. The perception that individual European armed forces do not have appropriate funds for defence\n 3. Previous defence collaborations between the participating states\n 1. Strong leadership by a group of enthusiastic high-level officials and good interpersonal chemistry between them\n 2. A supportive political milieu for the defence cooperation\n Interactions among factors\n Outline of the book\n2 Multinational Defence Cooperation in Europe\n Multinational defence cooperation in Europe and the subregional dimension\n The evolution of defence cooperation in Europe between 1990 and 2010\n Conclusion\n3 Conceptualizing Defence Cooperation\n The case studies: Lancaster House Treaties, NORDEFCO, CEDC\n Developing the theoretical framework\n Rival Explanation 1: lack of progress on pan-European/transatlantic defence cooperation\n Rival Explanation 2: effects of the financial crisis\n Rival Explanation 3: convergent threat perceptions\n Why were the subregional MDCs created? The empirically based patterns\n Factors necessary for the establishment of subregional MDCs: a generic framework\n Structural factors\n The existence of the European security community\n The perception that individual European armed forces do not have appropriate funds for defence\n Previous long-standing defence collaborations between the participating countries\n Situational factors\n Strong leadership by a group of enthusiastic high-level officials and good interpersonal chemistry between them\n Supportive political milieu for subregional multinational defence cooperation\n Conclusion\n4 The European Security Community\n Dissatisfaction with the shared meanings created and uploaded: the Lancaster House Treaties\n Different institutional memberships as the impetus for cooperation: NORDEFCO\n Social learning by superficial downloading: CEDC\n Conclusion\n5 Defence Budgets\n Doing it nationally: the Lancaster House Treaties\n The problem of critical mass of capabilities: NORDEFCO\n Drastic defence budget cuts result in drastic capability cuts: CEDC\n Conclusion\n6 Previous Defence Collaborations\n Recurring adaptive expectations: the Lancaster House Treaties\n Cooperation on peacekeeping during the Cold War: NORDEFCO\n Learning effects facilitate investing set-up costs: CEDC\n Conclusion\n7 Strong Leadership and Chemistry\n Positive North Atlantic attitudes: the Lancaster House Treaties\n Military leaders with an academic affinity: NORDEFCO\n Military officers in policy jobs: CEDC\n Conclusion\n8 Supportive Political Milieu\n The role of domestic politics: the Lancaster House Treaties\n Wider subregional support: NORDEFCO\n Borrowing policy frames from other defence collaborations: CEDC\n Conclusion\n9 How to Achieve Defence Cooperation in Europe\n Dynamics between the structural and situational factors: the theoretical model\n The Lancaster House Treaties\n The Nordic Defence Cooperation\n The Central European Defence Cooperation\n10 Conclusion\nNotes\nReferences\nIndex\nBack Cover