توضیحاتی در مورد کتاب Instruments and Related Concepts at the Syntax-Semantics Interface
نام کتاب : Instruments and Related Concepts at the Syntax-Semantics Interface
عنوان ترجمه شده به فارسی : ابزارها و مفاهیم مرتبط در رابط نحو-معناشناسی
سری :
نویسندگان : Koen Van Hooste
ناشر : düsseldorf university press
سال نشر : 2018
تعداد صفحات : 407
ISBN (شابک) : 9783110720365 , 9783957580597
زبان کتاب : English
فرمت کتاب : pdf
حجم کتاب : 6 مگابایت
بعد از تکمیل فرایند پرداخت لینک دانلود کتاب ارائه خواهد شد. درصورت ثبت نام و ورود به حساب کاربری خود قادر خواهید بود لیست کتاب های خریداری شده را مشاهده فرمایید.
فهرست مطالب :
Title\nAcknowledgments\nContents\nList of Figures\nList of Tables\nList of Abbreviations\n1 Introduction\n 1.1 Instruments, instrumentals & comitatives: phenomena and problems\n 1.2 Methodology\n 1.3 Glossing in this thesis\n 1.4 Structure of this thesis\n2 Role and Reference Grammar\n 2.1 Introduction\n 2.2 Fundamentals\n 2.3 Overall organization of Role and Reference Grammar\n 2.3.1 Constituent Projection\n 2.3.2 Operator Projection\n 2.4 The Semantic architecture of Role and Reference Grammar\n 2.4.1 Aktionsarten\n 2.4.2 Logical structures\n 2.5 Linking semantics to syntax\n 2.5.1 The Actor-Undergoer Hierarchy and the macroroles\n 2.5.2 Privileged Syntactic Argument\n 2.5.3 The Linking Algorithm\n 2.6 Conclusion\n3 Instruments at the syntax-semantics interface\n 3.1 Thematic relations as an interface component\n 3.1.1 Finite-primitive approaches\n 3.1.2 Lexical decomposition\n 3.1.3 Causality-driven approaches\n 3.1.4 Generalized Semantic Roles\n 3.1.5 Instrument as a thematic relation\n 3.2 Role and Reference Grammar\n 3.2.1 Thematic relations\n 3.2.2 The effector role: agents\n 3.2.3 The effector role: forces vs. instruments\n 3.3 Case Grammar\n 3.3.1 Overview\n 3.3.2 Instruments\n 3.4 Causality-driven approaches\n 3.4.1 Thematic relations\n 3.4.2 Instruments\n 3.5 Lexical-Functional Grammar\n 3.5.1 A-Structure and mapping to grammatical functions\n 3.5.2 Instruments\n 3.6 Conceptual Semantics\n 3.6.1 Overview\n 3.6.2 Thematic relations\n 3.6.3 Instruments\n 3.7 Instruments as subjects\n 3.7.1 The general approach\n 3.7.1.1 Naturalness conditions\n 3.7.1.2 Deliberation & mediation constraint\n 3.7.1.3 Conjunction test & do-test\n 3.7.1.4 Instruments as members of the agent class\n 3.7.2 The subtype approach\n 3.7.2.1 Intermediary & facilitating instruments\n 3.7.2.2 Instruments & implements\n 3.7.2.3 Webb’s Causal Force\n 3.7.3 Summary of instruments as subjects\n 3.8 Conclusion: properties of thematic relations and instruments\n4 Semantic range of instruments, agents & forces\n 4.1 Degrees of animacy & autonomy\n 4.1.1 Animacy\n 4.1.2 Autonomy\n 4.1.3 The actionality scale\n 4.1.4 Pseudo-agents\n 4.1.5 Inherent vs. induced features\n 4.2 The prevalence of instruments and implements with respect to verb classes\n 4.3 Integrating the actionality scale with logical structures\n 4.4 The three problems revisited\n 4.5 A different approach to the semantic range\n5 Instruments and causation: A Force Dynamic view\n 5.1 Fundamentals of Force Dynamics\n 5.1.1 Further patterns\n 5.1.2 Instruments in relation to causation\n 5.1.3 Integrating Force Dynamics with logical structures\n 5.1.4 Force Dynamics: More than causation\n 5.1.5 Configurations of volition and Holisky’s principle\n 5.2 Implements as facilitating instruments\n 5.2.1 Helping as weaker causality\n 5.2.2 Identifying implement and instruments: a new diagnostic\n 5.3 A proposal for enriched causation\n 5.3.1 Relevant dimensions for neutralization\n 5.3.2 Neutralization of causation\n 5.3.3 Enriched causation in the logical structures\n 5.4 Conclusion\n6 The Instrument-Subject Alternation and subtypes of instruments\n 6.1 Delineating instruments in subject position from other inanimates in subject position\n 6.2 Mechanics & purpose\n 6.3 A new naturalness condition as a prerequisite for ISA\n 6.4 Actionality constraint\n 6.5 Ability readings vs. ISA\n 6.6 General statements vs. ISA\n 6.7 Subtypes of instruments\n 6.7.1 Free instruments & blocked instruments\n 6.7.2 Conjoined instruments & conjoined implements\n 6.8 Conclusion\n7 Delimiting instruments from instrument-like participants\n 7.1 Causees\n 7.1.1 Causees taking instruments\n 7.1.2 Expanding the effector role\n 7.2 Comitatives\n 7.2.1 True comitatives\n 7.2.2 Undergoer & NMR comitatives\n 7.2.3 Comitatives with inanimate components\n 7.2.4 Inanimate comitatives\n 7.2.5 False inanimate comitatives\n 7.3 Proper parts as instruments\n 7.4 Potential instruments, implements & comitatives\n 7.5 Problematic cases of instruments\n 7.6 Conclusion\n8 Linking semantics to syntax\n 8.1 Three classes of prepositions\n 8.2 Argument linking in Role and Reference Grammar\n 8.2.1 Instrument and implement marking\n 8.2.2 Causee marking\n 8.2.3 Comitative marking\n 8.2.4 Inanimate comitatives\n 8.2.5 Marking of proper part-implements\n 8.2.6 Marking of potential instruments, implements and comitatives\n 8.2.7 Extending predicative with and without\n 8.3 Passive construction with an instrument\n 8.4 Passive ISA construction\n 8.5 Instrument unaccusative construction\n 8.6 Middle construction with an instrument\n 8.7 Impossible structures\n 8.8 Conclusion\n9 Conclusion: A semantic-syntactic landscape for instruments and related concepts\n 9.1 Summary of instrument-like concepts\n 9.2 Summary of expanded causation\n 9.3 Overview of tests\n 9.4 Future research\nAppendix: Figures\nReferences