دانلود کتاب International Crimes of State: A Critical Analysis of the ILC's Draft Article 19 on State Responsibility

فهرست مطالب :

Preface\nList of Contributors\nIntroduction\nPart I. Crimes of State: The Legislative History\nInternational Crimes of State: The Legislative History\nPart II. Crimes of State: The Problems Revisited\nThe Concept of “International Crimes” and its Place in Contemporary International Law\nObligations Erga Omnes, International Crimes and Jus Cogens: A Tentative Analysis of Three Related Concepts\nInternational Crimes – A Specific Regime of International Responsibility of States and its Legal Consequences\nImplications of the Institutionalization of International Crimes of State\nPart III. Crimes of State: A General Discussion\nIntroduction to the Debate\nGeneral Discussion. Observations on “Crimes of States“\nRemarks on the Present Legal Regulation of Crimes of States\nSome Comments on State Crimes and Lex Lata\nRemarks on Some Classes of Crimes by States\nState Crimes and Lex Lata\nOn Defining the Concept\nResponsibility and State Crimes\nThe Concept of Crimes of States: Evolution, Operation and Codification\nRemarks on Deficient Drafting of Article 19\nState Responsibility and the Concept of Crimes of States\nLex Lata: Is there already a Diffentiated Regime of State Responsibility in the Geneva Conventions?\nCritical Remarks on the Applicability of the Concept of Crimes of State to Humanitarian Law\nThe Continuity between Certain Principles of Humanitarian Law and the Concept of Crimes of States\nObligations Erga Omnes and the International Community\nShort Comments on the Concept of Crimes of States and Some Related Notions\nJUS Cogens and Crimes of State\nState Responsibility: Lex Ferenda and Crimes of State\nLex Lata or the Continuum of State Responsibility\nConvergences and Divergencies on the Legal Consequences of International Crimes of States: With Whom Should Lie the Right of Response?\nThe Objectives of a New Regime and the Means for Accomplishment\nCritical Observations on Crimes of State and the Notion of “International Community as a Whole”\nThe Concept of “International Community as a Whole”: A Guarantee to the Notion of State Crimes\nOn the Reaction of the “International Community as a Whole”: A Perspective of Survival\nCrimes of State, Ius Standi, and Third States\nState Crimes Implementation Problems: Who Reacts?\nThe Need to Abolish the Concept of Punishment\nCrimes of State: The Concept and Response\nLegal Questions Relating to the Consequences of International Crimes\nSome Short Remarks: Consequences and Terminology\nMeasures Available to Third States Reacting to Crimes of State\nThe Institutional Framework\nPart IV. Crimes of State: General Overviews of the Debate\nProblems and Issues Raised by Crimes of States: An Overview\nThe Need to Better Clarify the Concept of Crimes of States\nPart V. Crimes of State: Part Two of the ILC Work on State Responsibility\nInternational Crimes: Injury and Countermeasures. Comments on Part 2 of the ILC Work on State Responsiblity\nPart VI. Crimes of State: Conclusions\nOn Prophets and Judges. Some Personal Reflections on State Responsibility and Crimes of State\nPart VII. Crimes of State: Bibliography\nInternational Crimes of State. Bibliography 1946–1984\nPart VIII. Crimes of State: Annexes\nI. Draft Articles on State Responsibility Adopted So Far by the International Law Commission\nII. Draft Articles on State Responsibility Submitted by Special Rapporteur Riphagen