دانلود کتاب Law and the Precarious Home: Socio Legal Perspectives on the Home in Insecure Times

فهرست مطالب :

Acknowledgements\nContents\nList of Contributors\n1. Introducing Precarisation: Contemporary Understandings of Law and the Insecure Home\n I. Introduction\n II. The Home\n III. Insecure Times\n IV. The Home and Insecure Times\n V. Understanding Precarisation\n VI. Rental Security\n VII. The Home and Governmental Precarisation\n VIII. Global/Local Precariousness\n IX. Resistance and Strategies\n X. Conclusion\nPart I: Understanding Precarisation\n 2. Precarious Homes: The Sharing Continuum\n I. Introduction\n II. Sharing\n III. Tenure and The Home\n IV. Sharing Relationships and The Home\n V. Performativity, Participation, Protests and Precarity\n VI. Conclusions\n 3. Property, Well-being, and Home: Positive Psychology and Property Law\'s Foundations\n I. Introduction\n II. Psychology as Justification: Property and the Self\n III. Positive Psychology as a New Foundation\n IV. Revisiting Home as Where the Heart Is\n V. Conclusion\nPart II: Rental Security\n 4. The \'Affordable Alternative to Renting\': Property Guardians and Legal Dimensions of Housing Precariousness\n I. Introduction\n II. Property Guardians: An Overview\n III. Legal Dimensions of Precariousness\n IV. The Local Authority Response\n V. Conclusions\n 5. Public Housing Insecurity in New South Wales: An Historical Overview (1971–2014)\n I. Introduction\n II. Public Housing in New South Wales—A Brief History\n III. From \'Command and Control\' to \'Free\' Market to \'Soft\' Regulation\n IV. Public Housing Disputes Before the Court and then the Tribunal\n V. Methodology\n VI. Tenancies in the Waverley Area—General Features\n VII. Waverley Local Court and the Tribunal Compared: Findings\n VIII. Types of Public Housing Disputes and Outcomes from Waverley Court\n IX. Tenancy Tribunals and Public Housing Disputes (1989–2014)\n X. Terminations by Department of Housing: 2003–04 and 2005–14\n XI. Range of Matters Considered by the Court and the Tribunal\n XII. More Stringent Eligibility for, and Insecurity of, Public Housing\n XIII. Conclusion\n 6. The Tenant\'s Home and the Landlord\'s Property—The Polish Struggle to Achieve a Balance of Rights\n I. Introduction\n II. The Housing Situation in Poland\n III. The Problematic Rental Market\n IV. The Post-Communist Legacy of Regulated Rents\n V. Introducing Provisions on Increases of Regulated and Market Rents\n VI. ECtHR Evaluation of Tenancy Law Restrictions\n VII. The Hutten-Czapska v Poland Pilot Judgment\n VIII. Conclusions\nPart III: The Home and Governmental Precarisation\n 7. Law and the Precarious Home: A Case Study of Thermal Inefficiency in English Homes\n I. Introduction\n II. Thermal Inefficiency and Precarity\n III. From Keeping Home Fires Burning to the Privatisation of Domestic Energy Supplies\n IV. Governing through House Building and Property Ownership\n V. Conclusion\n 8. Governing Risk and Uncertainty: Financialisation and the Regulatory Framework of Housing Associations\n I. Introduction\n II. Financialisation, Risk and Uncertainty\n III. Governing Risks and Precariousness within Social Housing Finance\n IV. De-Risking Lending Through the Use of Stock as Collateral\n V. Precarity and Uncertainty Under Austerity Urbanism\n VI. Governing Precariousness in a \'Post-Crisis\' Context\n VII. Conclusion\n 9. Safe and Sound: Precariousness, Compartmentation and Death at Home\n I. Introduction\n II. Governmental Precarisation and the Disruption of Safety\n III. The Right to Buy and Precarisation\n IV. The Fire at Lakanal House\n V. Governing through Precarisation—The Approach of the DCLG\n VI. Governing through Precarity—The Approach of Southwark\n VII. Conclusion\nPart IV: Global/Local Precariousness\n 10. The UK as a Precarious Home\n I. Introduction\n II. \'Text \"Go Home\" or Face Arrest\'\n III. The UK and Precarious Migrant Status\n IV. Precarity vs Integration: The UK\'s Contradictory Approach\n V. Conclusion\n 11. Precarious Home and Institutional Ambiguity in China\'s Urbanisation\n I. Introduction\n II. The Rural-Urban Divide and the Dual-Track Lurs Allocation System\n III. Central-Local Relationships and Institutional Ambiguity\n IV. Minor Rights Property and Precarious Home Ownership\n V. Disputes Over Precarious Home Ownership\n VI. Conclusion\n 12. On Shaky Ground: Homes as Socio-Legal Spaces in a Post-Earthquake Environment\n I. Introduction\n II. The Theoretical Backdrop\n III. The Shaky Isles: Earthquakes in New Zealand\n IV. New Zealand\'s Earthquake Insurance Scheme\n V. Preparedness Pre-September 2010\n VI. Post-September 2010: An Immediate Response\n VII. Post-Disaster Insurance Issues\n VIII. One Couple\'s Experiences\n IX. Conclusion\nPart V: Resistance and Strategies\n 13. Precarity and Defiance in Temporary Accommodation: The King Hill Hostel Campaign, 1965–66\n I. Introduction\n II. Precarious, Precarity, and Precarisation at King Hill Hostel\n III. Governmental Precarisation\n IV. Conclusion\n 14. Responding to the Precarisation of Housing: A Case Study of PAH Barcelona\n I. Introduction\n II. Precarious Housing—The Spanish Context\n III. The PAH (Plataforma Afectados Por La Hipoteca)\n IV. Methodology\n V. From \'Affected to Activist\': The Awareness and Empowerment Process Promoted by PAH\n VI. The First Phase of the Negotiation Process\n VII. The Second Phase of the Negotiation Process\n VIII. The Third Phase of the Negotiation Process\n IX. Who are the Affected People that Came to PAH Over the Years?\n X. Why did these People Stop Paying their Mortgage at Some Point? and what are the Characteristics of these Contracts?\n XI. What is the Situation of the Affected People When they Arrive for the First Time at PAH, and what are their Objectives?\n XII. What are the Results of Negotiations Between Affected People and Banks?\n XIII. Conclusions\n 15. Returning Home?\n I. Introduction\n II. Background\n III. Analysis\n IV. Conclusion\nIndex