فهرست مطالب :
Cover
Half Title
Title Page
Copyright Page
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements
Series Preface
Introduction
Part I: Textual analysis
Chapter 1: Michael King and Chris Thornhill, ‘Society’s Legal System’, in Michael King and Chris Thornhill, Niklas Luhmann’s Theory of Politics and Law (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2003), pp. 35–68
Chapter 2: Jean Clam, ‘Une nouvelle sociologie du droit? Autour de Das Recht der Gesellschaft de Niklas Luhmann.’ Droit et société 33(1) (1996), pp. 405–423
Part II: Luhmann and political sociology
Chapter 3: Frieder Naschold, ‘Demokratie und Komplexität: Thesen und Illustrationen zur Theoriediskussion in der Politikwissenschaft.’ Politische Vierteljahresschrift 9(3) (1968), pp. 494–518
Chapter 4: Peter Nahamowitz, ‘Autopoiesis oder ökonomischer Staatsinterventionismus?’ Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie 9 (1988), pp. 36–73
Chapter 5: Chris Thornhill, ‘Niklas Luhmann: A Sociological Transformation of Political Legitimacy?’ Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 13 (2006), pp. 33–53
Chapter 6: Jean Clam, ‘What is Modern Power?’, in Michael King and Chris Thornhill, Luhmann on Law and Politics. Critical Appraisals and Applications (Oxford: Hart, 2006), pp. 145–162
Part III: Luhmann and legal sociology
Chapter 7: Gunther Teubner, ‘Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law.’ Law & Society Review 17(2) (1983), pp. 239–286
Chapter 8: Hubert Rottleuthner, ‘A Purified Sociology of Law: Niklas Luhmann on the Autonomy of the Legal System.’ Law & Society Review 23(5) (1989), pp. 779–798
Chapter 9: Inger-Johanne Sand, ‘The Interaction of Society, Politics and Law: The Legal and Communicative Theories of Habermas, Luhmann and Teubner.’ Scandinavian Studies in Law 53 (2008), pp. 45–75
Chapter 10: Gert Verschraegen, ‘Human Rights and Modern Society: A Sociological Analysis from the Perspective of Systems Theory.’ Journal of Law and Society 29(2) (2002), pp. 258–281
Chapter 11: Marcelo Neves, ‘From the Autopoiesis to the Allopoiesis of Law.’ Journal of Law and Society 28(2) (2001), pp. 242–264
Part IV: Luhmann and theoretical controversies
Chapter 12: Chris Thornhill, ‘Jürgen Habermas and Niklas Luhmann: Two Rival Critiques of Metaphysics’, Chris Thornhill, German Political Philosophy. The Metaphysics of Law (London: Routledge, 2006), pp. 314–339
Chapter 13: Poul Kjaer, ‘Systems in Context. On the Outcome of the Habermas/Luhmann-Debate.’ Ancilla juris (2006), pp. 66–77
Chapter 14: Gunther Teubner, ‘Economics of Gift – Positivity of Justice: The Mutual Paranoia of Jacques Derrida and Niklas Luhmann.’ Theory, Culture and Society 18 (2001), pp. 29–47
Chapter 15: Christoph Menke, ‘The Self-Reflection of Law and the Politics of Rights.’ Constellations 18(2) (2011), pp. 124–134
Chapter 16: Karl-Heinz Ladeur, ‘Recht und Gerechtigkeit bei Derrida und Luhmann: Eine Kritik auf systemtheoretischer Grundlage.’ Rechtstheorie 43(3) (2012), pp. 271–323
Part V: Luhmann and new theoretical developments
Chapter 17: Gunther Teubner, ‘Societal Constitutionalism: Alternatives to State-Centred Constitutional Theory?’ in Christian Joerges, Inger-Johanne Sand and Gunther Teubner (eds), Transnational Governance and Constitutionalism (Oxford: Hart, 2004), pp. 3–28
Chapter 18: Marc Amstutz, ‘Métissage: On the Form of Law in World Society.’ Zeitschrift für vergleichende Rechtswissenschaft 11 (2013), pp. 336–360
Chapter 19: Mathias Albert, ‘Observing World Politics. Luhmann’s Systems Theory of Society and International Relations.’ Millennium 29(2) (1999), pp. 239–265
Chapter 20: Andreas Fischer-Lescano, ‘Critical Systems Theory.’ Philosophy & Social Criticism 38(1) (2012), pp. 3–23
Index