دانلود کتاب Morphophonemic Variability, Productivity, and Change: The Case of Rusyn

فهرست مطالب :

Acknowledgments\nList of tables\nList of figures\n1 Introduction\n1. The Rusyn people - their present and past\n2. The Rusyn language - its past and present\n2.1. The spoken language\n2.2. The written language\n3. An overview of the current study\n2 Recent approaches to morphophonemics\n1. The roots of morphophonemics\n2. The generative approach to morphophonemics\n3. Alternative approaches to morphophonemics\n3.1. Some problems with the generativist position\n3.2. Morphophonology according to Linell\n3.3. Morphophonemics in Bybee’s model of morphology\n3 Two models of language and language change\n1. The sociolinguistic approach to the study of sound change\n1.1. Empirical foundations\n1.2. The observability of sound change\n1.3. Implementation of change through the linguistic structure\n1.4. Implementation of linguistic change through the social matrix\n1.5. Explaining linguistic change\n2. An analogical model of morphology\n2.1. Rules vs. representations\n2.2. The organization of paradigms\n2.3. Local markedness\n2.4. A dynamic model of the lexicon\n2.5. Morphophonemic alternations across paradigms\n2.6. Productivity\n4 Two morphophonemic alternation patterns in Rusyn\n1. The “velar palatalization” in Rusyn\n2. The “velar palatalization” from a broader perspective\n2.1. The second palatalization in Slavic - diachrony and synchrony\n2.2. The semantic context in the masculine nominative plural\n3. The “dental palatalization” in Rusyn\n4. The “dental palatalization” from a broader perspective\n5 The Rusyn study: Data collection and analysis\n1. The organization of the field work\n1.1. The population sample\n1.2. The linguistic questionnaire\n1.3. Collecting the linguistic data\n2. The analysis of the data\n2.1. Two approaches to the study of social variation in language\n2.2. Procedure for the response coincidence analysis\n6 The “velar palatalization” pattern: A close-up view\n1. The adult sample\n1.1. The k-stem real words\n1.2. The k-stem non-words\n2. The non-adult sample\n2.1. The k-stem real and non-words\n3. Summary\n7 The “dental palatalization” pattern in the spotlight\n1. The d-stem words\n1.1. The adult speakers\n1.2. The non-adult informants\n2. The t-stem words\n2.1. The adult speakers\n2.2. The non-adult informants\n3. The z-stem words\n3.1. The adult speakers\n3.2. The non-adult informants\n4. The s-stem words\n4.1. The adult speakers\n4.2. The non-adult informants\n5. The 1-stem words\n5.1. The adult speakers\n5.2. The non-adult informants\n6. The n-stem words\n6.1. The adult speakers\n6.2. The non-adult informants\n7. Discussion of the “dental palatalization” pattern\n7.1. The adult speakers\n7.2. The non-adult informants\n7.3. Comrie’s phonetic distance and the single rule hypothesis\n7.4. Tiersma’s “local markedness” hypothesis\n8. Summary\n8 Conclusion\n1. Morphophonemic variability, productivity, and change\n1.1. Variability\n1.2. Productivity\n1.3. Change\n2. Some implications for the theoretical framework\n2.1. Bybee’s analogy-based model of morphology\n2.2. Labov’s sociolinguistic approach to the study of language change\nAppendices\nA Distribution of adult subjects within the social structure\nB k-stem masculine nouns\nC Dental-stem masculine nouns\nD The “velar palatalization” pattern: Dendrograms\nE Adult subject groups for the “dental palatalization” pattern\nF Non-adult subject groups for the “dental palatalization” pattern\nAbstract\nNotes\nReferences\nName index\nSubject index