دانلود کتاب Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy: Volume 2

فهرست مطالب :

Cover\nOxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy Volume 2\nCopyright\nContents\nExplaining Exact Resemblance: Gilbert of Poitiers’s Conformitas Theory Reconsidered\n 1. GILBERT’S ONTOLOGY\n 1.1 Two kinds of substantial being: subsistens and subsistentia\n 1.2 Ontological particularism\n 1.3 The metaphysical constitution of an individual\n 1.4 Resemblance\n 1.5 Gilbert’s theory of universals\n 2. A PLATONIC DOCTRINE?\n BIBLIOGRAPHY\nI See Dead People: Disembodied Souls and Aquinas’s Two-Person Problem\n 1. THE RICH MAN AND LAZARUS\n 2. HUMAN ACTIVITIES AND THE RATIONAL SOUL\n 3. THE COGNITION OF THE SEPARATED SOUL\n 4. HUMAN BEINGS, PERSONS, AND ME\n 5. THE RICH MAN(’S SOUL) AND THE PROBLEM OF SELF-REFERENCE\n 6. PARTIAL IDENTITY AND CONSTITUTION\n 7. IMMEDIATE RESURRECTION\n BIBLIOGRAPHY\nAquinas and Scotus on the Source of Contingency\n 1. CONTINGENTLY EXISTING VERSUS CONTINGENTLY CAUSED EFFECTS AND THEIR ACCOMPANYING THEOLOGICAL DIFFICULTIES\n 2. AQUINAS ON THE CAUSE OF CONTINGENCY IN CREATION\n 3. SCOTUS ON THE CAUSE OF CONTINGENCY IN CREATION\n 4. CONCLUSION\n BIBLIOGRAPHY\nPeter John Olivi and Peter Auriol on Conceptual Thought\n 1. OLIVI\n 1.1 Olivi’s Tractatus\n 1.2 Olivi’s alternative\n 1.3 Concessions to indirect realism\n 2. AURIOL AND INDIRECT REALISM\n 2.1 Auriol’s dilemma\n 2.2 Auriol’s alternative\n 2.3 Auriol on recollection and imagination\n 3. CONCLUSIONS\n BIBLIOGRAPHY\nAquinas on Spiritual Change\n BIBLIOGRAPHY\nPseudo-Joscelin: Treatise on Genera and Species\n 1. INTEGRAL WHOLES (§§1–20)\n 2. THE DESTRUCTION OF SOCRATES (§§21–31)\n 3. THE PROBLEM OF UNIVERSALS (§§32–147)\n 4. THE ELEMENTS (§§148–157)\n 5. SUBSTANTIAL DIFFERENTIAE (§§158–182)\n 6. SIMPLE MATTER AND PURE FORM (§§183–208)\n 7. CONCLUSION\n BIBLIOGRAPHY\nCONSPECTUS ABBREVIATIONUM\n: \nTreatise on Genera and Species\n [1. INTEGRAL WHOLES]\n [1.1 Continuous Wholes]\n [1.2 Discrete Wholes]\n DE DESTRUCTIONE SOCRATIS\n 2. THE DESTRUCTION OF SOCRATES\n [2.1 The Puzzle]\n [2.2 First Solution]\n < DE GENERIBUS ET SPECIEBUS >\n [2.3 Second Solution]\n [3. THE PROBLEM OF UNIVERSALS]\n [3.1 Material Essence Realism]\n [3.1.1 Statement Of Material Essence Realism]\n [3.1.2 Arguments Against Material Essence Realism]\n [3.2 Indifference Realism]\n [3.2.1 Statement of Indifference Realism]\n [3.2.2 Authorities Against Indifference Realism]\n [3.3 Nominalism]\n [3.3.1 Statement of Nominalism]\n [3.3.2 Authorities Against Nominalism]\n [3.3.3 Arguments Against Nominalism]\n [3.4 Collective Realism]\n [3.4.1 Statement of Collective Realism]\n [3.4.2 Objections to Collective Realism]\n [3.4.3 Authorities Against Collective Realism]\n [3.4.4 Authorities Supporting Collective Realism]\n < DE ELEMENTIS >\n [4. THE ELEMENTS]\n DE SUBSTANTIALIBUS DIFFERENTIIS\n 5. SUBSTANTIAL DIFFERENTIAE\n [6. SIMPLE MATTER AND PURE FORM]\n [6.1 Simple Matter]\n [6.2 Pure Form]\nCritical Study of Fabrizio Amerini’s: Aquinas on the Beginning and End of Human Life\n 1. SUMMARY\n 2. EXEGETICAL MATTERS\n 3. DELAYED HOMINIZATION TODAY\n 4. CONCLUSION\n BIBLIOGRAPHY\nBriefly Noted\nNotes for Contributors\nIndex of Names