دانلود کتاب Phases: An essay on cyclicity in syntax

فهرست مطالب :

List of glosses used\n1 Introduction\n 1.1 Overview\n 1.2 Theoretical sketch\n2 On successive-cyclic movement\n 2.1 Introduction\n 2.2 Are movement paths punctuated or uniform?\n 2.2.1 What constitutes a valid argument for punctuated paths?\n 2.2.2 Proposed evidence for punctuated paths (Abels 2003c)\n 2.2.3 Reconstruction in Norwegian\n 2.2.4 Evidence from ellipsis\n 2.2.5 Parasitic gaps (Nissenbaum, 2001)\n 2.2.6 A point of logic: Condition C and scope for binding\n 2.2.7 Conclusion\n 2.3 The edge of CP as a landing site of successive-cyclic movement\n 2.4 Reflection\n3 Some properties of movement\n 3.1 Introduction\n 3.2 Partial movement\n 3.3 Pied-piping\n 3.4 Secondary movement\n 3.5 Reflection\n4 The theory of cyclicity and phases\n 4.1 Configurations for feature-sharing\n 4.2 Movement and last resort\n 4.3 Phase impenetrability\n 4.3.1 Phases and sub-numerations\n 4.3.2 Phase impenetrability and islands\n 4.3.3 The stranding generalization\n 4.4 Phase heads and their features\n 4.4.1 Implementing successive cyclicity\n 4.4.2 Morphological parameterization\n 4.4.3 Extraction in Austronesian\n5 Feature Values and Interpretation\n 5.1 Feature interpretation\n 5.2 Towards a precise formulation\n 5.3 Possible systems based on a single feature: A dry run\n 5.3.1 [uF↓] probes\n 5.3.2 [uF↓↑] probes\n 5.3.3 [uF↑] probes\n 5.4 The generalizations\n 5.4.1 Partial Movement\n 5.4.2 Pied-piping and secondary movement\n 5.5 Wh-movement in various languages\n 5.5.1 Single-Wh-movement languages: English, French, Italian\n 5.5.2 Multiple-Wh-fronting languages\n 5.5.3 Wh-in-situ\n 5.6 Summary\n6 The phase heads v, C, P and the stranding generalization\n 6.1 VP immobility under v\n 6.1.1 VPs are mobile\n 6.1.2 VPs do not strand v\n 6.2 TP immobility under C\n 6.2.1 TPs do not strand C\n 6.2.2 TPs are mobile\n 6.2.3 The ban on C-stranding, word order, and cartography\n 6.2.4 Is there long TP movement?\n 6.3 DP immobility under P\n 6.3.1 PP pied-piping\n 6.3.2 Subextraction\n 6.4 Conclusion\n7 On adposition stranding\n 7.1 Trace or null resumptive?\n 7.2 P-stranding in German and Dutch\n 7.2.1 R-words are not pronouns\n 7.2.2 R-words are not complements of P\n 7.2.3 So what are R-words? And where?\n 7.3 P-stranding languages\n 7.3.1 Special clitics as the complement of adpositions\n 7.3.2 Was für split\n 7.3.3 Adposition stranding and D-to-P incorporation\n 7.3.4 The pseudo passive\n 7.3.5 Adposition stranding and verbal particles\n 7.3.6 Implications\n 7.4 Conclusion\n8 Phases\n9 Bibliography\n10 Index