دانلود کتاب Radicalization in Belgium and the Netherlands: Critical Perspectives on Violence and Security

فهرست مطالب :

Cover page\nHalftitle page\nTitle page\nCopyright page\nCONTENTS\nLIST OF FIGURES\nACKNOWLEDGEMENTS\nLIST OF CONTRIBUTORS\nINTRODUCTION\n RADICALIZATION: TRACING THE TRAJECTORY OF AN ‘EMPTY SIGNIFIER’ IN THE LOW LANDS\n The focus on the Netherlands and Belgium\n The (inter)national trajectories of an ‘empty signifier’\n Radicalization and/as Islam\n Outline of the chapters\n Notes\nPart I THE CIRCULATION OF A CONTESTED CONCEPT\n Chapter 1 RADICALIZATION: THE ORIGINS AND LIMITS OF A CONTESTED CONCEPT1\n 2001–4: The origins of a novel concept\n 2005: The institutionalization of competing paradigms\n A comet in the EU counterterrorism sky: The EC Expert Group on violent radicalization\n Pull and limits of a concept\n Conclusion\n Notes\n Chapter 2 TURNING ‘RADICALIZATION’ INTO SCIENCE: AMBIVALENT TRANSLATIONS INTO THE DUTCH (SPEAKING) ACADEMIC FIELD\n Radicalization and the BVD/AIVD: An overview\n Academic translations of radicalization\n Conclusion\n Notes\n Chapter 3 CONSIDERING INTERNAL DEBATES ON ‘RADICALISM’ WITHIN THE BRUSSELS’ ISLAMIC COMMUNITY\n A united Islamic ummah against a not-so-Islamic-problem\n ‘Salafism’ is radical\n Conclusion\n Notes\nPart II DE/RADICALIZATION POLICIES ON THE GROUND\n Chapter 4 FOREIGN FIGHTERS ON TRIAL: SENTENCING RISK, 2013-171\n The precautionary turn in criminal law\n Trials as a performative space\n Criminal law meets radicalization theories\n Terrorism trials under scrutiny\n Sentencing as risk management\n Notes\n Chapter 5 PRE-EMPTIVE MEASURES AGAINST RADICALIZATION AND LOCAL PARTNERSHIPS IN ANTWERP\n Pre-emption and prevention\n Pre-emption and community engagement\n Different forms of pre-emptive community-based partnerships: Value-based and means-based\n Antwerp and its emerging threat: Sharia4Belgium\n Policy measures in Antwerp\n Possible Islamic partners for local authorities in Antwerp\n Reactions by other ‘radical’ Islamic groups in Antwerp towards Sharia4Belgium, and first steps in starting programmes\n Conclusion\n Notes\n Chapter 6 COUNTERING RADICALIZATION: HIJACKING TRUST? DILEMMAS OF STREET-LEVEL BUREAUCRATS IN THE NETHERLANDS\n Development and implementation of counter-radicalization policies in the Netherlands\n Trust and suspicion in countering radicalization\n Counter-radicalization and the incompatibility of trust and suspicion\n Conclusion\n Notes\n Chapter 7 (DE-)RADICALIZATION AS A NEGOTIATED PRACTICE: AN ETHNOGRAPHIC CASE STUDY IN FLANDERS\n Deradicalization and the anthropology of ‘the state’\n Deradicalization as a ‘local affair’\n Negotiating ‘radicalization’\n Distinguishing oneself as an expert: ‘Our recipe to counter radicalization’\n Establishing trust: Between formality and informality\n Conclusion\n Notes\nPart III DE/RADICALIZATION AND ITS EFFECTS\n Chapter 8 ROUTINIZATION AND MOBILIZATION OF INJUSTICE: HOW TO LIVE IN A REGIME OF SURVEILLANCE\n The racialization of danger in the Netherlands\n The regime of surveillance\n Soft surveillance: The experience of being marked as a problem\n Hard surveillance: ‘We are being watched’\n The Hondius case: How mobilization and routinization interfere\n Conclusion\n Notes\n Chapter 9 CAN THE ‘MUHAJIR’ SPEAK? EUROPEAN SYRIA FIGHTERS AND THE DIGITAL UN/MAKING OF HOME\n Knowledge production on radicalization\n Methodology: Complementary practices of looking\n Discussion: Jihadi ego in new media\n Conclusion\n Notes\n Chapter 10 NO ESCAPE: THE FORCE OF THE SECURITY FRAME IN ACADEMIA AND BEYOND1\n Our point of departure: Academic and public debates\n Methods used and insights gained\n Textual politics: From marriage to a ‘security issue’\n Countering the security frame: An appeal to reason\n Authorship matters\n Positionality and the unequal division of distrust\n The research process: The vulnerability of anthropology\n A brief reflection: Overdetermined by the security discourse\n Notes\nCONCLUSIONS\n Chapter 11 FROM CONVERT TO RADICAL: MAKING CRITIQUE ILLEGIBLE\n Conversion is radical\n Dismissing liberal-secular critique\n Conclusion\n Notes\n Chapter 12 THE MAZE OF RADICALIZATION: JUSTIFICATION AND PROFESSIONAL INTERESTS\n Radicalization: A regime of justification used for preventive strategies\n The war on terror and the normalization of pre-emptive interventions\n The polysemy of a policy\n Radicalization as a folk theory and the responsibility of academics\n The art of asking the right question\n Notes\nAFTERWORD\n A DE/RADICALIZED FUTURE\n Notes\nBIBLIOGRAPHY\nINDEX