دانلود کتاب Regulating Content on Social Media: Copyright, Terms of Service and Technological Features

فهرست مطالب :

Cover\nHalf Title\nTitle Page\nCopyright Page\nPrologue\nAcknowledgements\nTable of Contents\nList of tables\nIntroduction\n I. Regulation on social media\n II. Regulation of content-generative behaviours from a copyright perspective\n III. Approach\n IV. Structure\n Notes\nChapter One Scope of study and a day in the life of Jane Doe\n I. Defining social media and user-generated content\n II. Choice of social media platforms\n III. A day in the life of Jane\n IV. Conclusion\n Notes\nChapter Two Regulation by copyright laws\n I. Relevant copyright standards\n A. Subsistence: works and other subject matter protected by copyright\n B. Subsistence: originality\n C. Subsistence: authorship\n D. Subsistence: fixation, recording or reduction to material form\n E. Infringement: scope of protection\n F. Infringement: other rights\n G. Infringement: remedies\n H. Infringement: fair use and fair dealing exceptions\n I. Conflict of laws issues\n J. Summary\n II. Scenario one: the application of copyright laws\n A. Jane’s use of the music video clip on YouTube as her morning alarm\n B. Jane’s ‘pinning’ of the YouTube music video clip on her pin-board titled ‘My Favourite Things’ on Pinterest\n C. Jane’s use of Evangeline’s earlier commentary on Facebook to create her own commentary\n D. Jane’s use of multiple photographs of newborn babies available on the pin-boards of other Pinterest users to create a collage to share on Pinterest\n E. Jane’s simultaneous sharing of the collage on Facebook and Twitter\n F. Jane’s sharing of the same collage in her blog post on WordPress\n G. Zee’s contribution to Wikipedia on ‘income inequality’ using what Jane has written\n H. Jane’s creation and sharing of a new video clip by way of ‘vidding’ on YouTube, and subsequently on Facebook\n I. Cheryl’s use of ‘stills’ from Jane’s video clip as thumbnail images on her website\n J. Other users’ partial use of Jane’s collage to create their own, and sharing the same on Pinterest, Facebook and Twitter\n K. Editor Jasper’s use of Jane’s collage on the cover page of his magazine\n III. Conclusion\n Notes\nChapter Three Application of the terms of service\n I. Terms of service\n A. Ownership and licensing\n 1. Facebook\n 2. Pinterest\n 3. YouTube\n 4. Twitter\n 5. Wikipedia\n 6. Observations\n B. Copyright policy\n 1. Facebook\n 2. Pinterest\n 3. YouTube\n 4. Twitter\n 5. Wikipedia\n 6. Observations\n C. Indemnification and limitation of liability\n 1. Facebook\n 2. Pinterest\n 3. YouTube\n 4. Twitter\n 5. Wikipedia\n 6. Observations\n D. Governing law and jurisdiction\n 1. Facebook\n 2. Pinterest\n 3. YouTube\n 4. Twitter\n 5. Wikipedia\n 6. Observations\n E. Summary\n II. Scenario two: the application of the terms of service\n A. Jane’s use of the music video clip on YouTube as her morning alarm\n B. Jane’s ‘pinning’ of the YouTube music video clip on her pin-board titled ‘My Favourite Things’ on Pinterest\n C. Jane’s use of Evangeline’s earlier commentary on Facebook to create her own commentary\n D. Jane’s use of multiple photographs of newborn babies available on the pin-boards of other Pinterest users to create a collage to share on Pinterest\n E. Jane’s simultaneous sharing of the collage on Facebook and Twitter\n F. Jane’s use of the same collage in her blog post on WordPress\n G. Zee’s contribution to Wikipedia on ‘income inequality’ using what Jane has written\n H. Jane’s creation and sharing of a new video clip by way of ‘vidding’ on YouTube and subsequently on Facebook\n I. Cheryl’s use of ‘stills’ from Jane’s video clip as thumbnail images on her website\n J. Other users’ partial use of Jane’s collage to create their own, and sharing the same on Pinterest, Facebook and Twitter\n K. Editor Jasper’s use of Jane’s collage on the cover page of his magazine\n III. Relationship with the copyright regimes\n A. Alignment with the copyright regimes\n B. Potential incompatibilities with the copyright regimes\n 1. Vesting of ‘ownership’ under the terms of service\n 2. Imposition of the terms of service on third parties\n 3. Choice of governing law and jurisdiction\n (a) Choice of law\n (b) Choice of jurisdiction\n (c) Applicable copyright legislation\n (d) Implications\n IV. Conclusion\n Notes\nChapter Four Influence of the technological features\n I. Technological features\n A. Technological features that encourage content-generative activities\n 1. Creation\n 2. Modification\n 3. Dissemination\n B. Technological features that constrain content-generative activities\n 1. Limiting the modification of content\n 2. Limiting the opportunities to engage in further content-generative activities\n 3. Allowing for requests to remove content\n 4. Filtering content\n C. Summary\n II. Scenario three: the influence of the technological features\n A. Jane’s use of the music video clip on YouTube as her morning alarm\n B. Jane’s ‘pinning’ of the YouTube music video clip on her pin-board titled ‘My Favourite Things’ on Pinterest\n C. Jane’s use of Evangeline’s earlier commentary on Facebook to create her own commentary\n D. Jane’s use of multiple photographs of newborn babies available on the pin-boards of other Pinterest users to create a collage to share on Pinterest\n E. Jane’s simultaneous sharing of the collage on Facebook and Twitter\n F. Jane’s use of the same collage in her blog post on WordPress\n G. Zee’s contribution to Wikipedia on ‘income inequality’ using what Jane has written\n H. Jane’s creation and sharing of a new video clip by way of ‘vidding’ on YouTube, and subsequently on Facebook\n I. Cheryl’s use of ‘stills’ from Jane’s video clip as thumbnail images on her website\n J. Other users’ partial use of Jane’s collage to create their own, and sharing the same on Pinterest, Facebook and Twitter\n K. Editor Jasper’s use of Jane’s collage on the cover page of his magazine\n III. Relationship with the copyright regimes\n A. Attribution of generator of content\n B. Notice and takedown mechanisms\n C. Filtering out content\n IV. Conclusion\n Notes\nChapter Five How the terms of service and technological features affect copyright’s regulation of content-generative behaviou\n I. Perceptions and awareness of copyright laws\n A. Prior studies\n 1. Perceived irrelevance and poor understanding of copyright laws\n 2. Expectation that digital content is free\n 3. Greater impact of perceptions on compliance with copyright laws\n B. Users’ perceptions and awareness of copyright laws\n C. Terms of service and users’ awareness of copyright laws\n D. Technological features and users’ perceptions of copyright laws\n II. Scenario four: regulation by copyright laws, the terms of service and technological features\n A. Jane’s use of the music video clip on YouTube as her morning alarm\n B. Jane’s ‘pinning’ of the YouTube music video clip on her pin-board titled ‘My Favourite Things’ on Pinterest\n C. Jane’s use of Evangeline’s earlier commentary on Facebook to create her own commentary\n D. Jane’s use of multiple photographs of newborn babies available on the pin-boards of other Pinterest users to create a collage to share on Pinterest\n E. Jane’s simultaneous sharing of the collage on Facebook and Twitter\n F. Jane’s use of the same collage in her blog post on WordPress\n G. Zee’s contribution to Wikipedia on ‘income inequality’ using what Jane has written\n H. Jane’s creation and sharing of a new video clip by way of ‘vidding’ on YouTube, and subsequently on Facebook\n I. Cheryl’s use of ‘stills’ from Jane’s video clip as thumbnail images on her website\n J. Other users’ partial use of Jane’s collage to create their own, then sharing the same on Pinterest, Facebook and Twitter\n K. Editor Jasper’s use of Jane’s collage on the cover page of his magazine\n L. Concluding observations\n III. Regulation of content-generative behaviours by copyright laws\n IV. Conclusion\n Notes\nConclusion\n I. Fairness from a user’s perspective\n II. Why regulating social media matters\n Notes\nBibliography\n I. Articles/Books/Reports\n A. Articles\n B. Books\n C. Reports\n D. Others\n II. Cases\n A. US cases\n B. UK cases\n C. Australian cases\n D. Other cases\n III. Legislation\n A. US legislation\n B. UK legislation\n C. Australian legislation\n D. Other legislation\n IV. Treaties/Supranational materials\n V. Others\nAppendix 1: Screenshots of the technological features\nIndex\nBack Cover