دانلود کتاب Socializing Development: Transnational Social Movement Advocacy and the Human Rights Accountability of Multilateral Development Banks

فهرست مطالب :

Cover\nContents\nAcknowledgements\nAbstract\nList of Abbreviations\nIntroduction\n Theoretical Starting Point and Research Question\n Analytical Framework\n Research Design, Case Selection and Main Findings\n Basic Assumptions and Normative Relevance\n My Contributions\n1 Human Rights Accountability as a minimum threshold of MDB Legitimacy\n 1.1 Multilateral Development Banks – A Definition\n 1.2 The Growing Responsibilities of Multilateral Development Banks\n 1.3 Conceptions of Accountability\n 1.4 Human Rights as the relevant Standard of Accountability\n 1.4.1 Human Rights as the Protection of Basic Human Interests\n 1.4.2 Legal Arguments for the Human Rights Obligations of MDBs\n 1.4.3 MDB Obligations in light of larger Empirical Trends in Global Governance\n2 Transnational Social Movements as agents of change in World Politics\n 2.1 Transnational Social Movements – A Definition\n 2.2 The Transnationalization of Social Movement Activity\n 2.3 Social Movement Tactics\n 2.4 Socialization and the Outcomes of Social Movements\n3 Analytical Framework\n 3.1 MDB Socialization through Human Rights Accountability\n 3.2 Scope Conditions of Movement Influence\n 3.2.1 Properties of the actor seeking change\n 3.2.2 Properties of the targeted organization\n 3.2.3 Properties of the issue\n 3.2.4 Properties of the discursive opportunity structure\n 3.3 Counter Mobilization as continuous MDB - TSM interaction\n 3.4 Two Logics of Action and Organizational Change\n 3.5 A Causal Mechanism of Movement influence\n 3.5.1 The Power of Disruptive Tactics (Part I)\n 3.5.2 The Power of Conventional Tactics (Part II)\n 3.5.3 Member State Incentives, Sanctions and Coercion (Part III)\n4 Research Design\n 4.1 Process-Tracing: Uncovering Causal Mechanisms\n 4.1.1 Underlying understandings of causality\n 4.1.2 Theory Testing Process Tracing\n 4.1.3 Methodological Limitations\n 4.1.4 Process Tracing in Comparative Case Study Designs\n 4.2 Case Selection\n 4.3 Operationalization\n 4.3.1 Socialization Outcome: Human Rights Accountability\n 4.3.2 The Cause: Joint Transnational Social Movement Activism\n 4.3.3 Disruptive Movement Tactics towards the MDB (Part 1)\n 4.3.4 Conventional Tactics toward Member States (Part 2)\n 4.3.5 Member State Incentives Toward the MDB (Part 3)\n 4.3.6 Rules of Aggregation\n 4.4 Data Collection and Analysis\n 4.4.1 Data Collection\n 4.4.2 Data Analysis\n5 Human Rights Accountability at the World Bank\n 5.1 The World Bank – A short introduction\n 5.2 Human Rights and Transparency in World Bank “Safeguards”\n 5.3 Sanctions in cases of non‐compliance: The World Bank Inspection Panel\n 5.4 Summary of Case Study Outcomes\n6 Case 1: A Revolution of World Bank Accountability (1988 – 1994)\n 6.1 Cause: Joint Transnational Social Movement activity\n 6.2 Part 1: Disruptive TSM tactics causing MDB Crisis\n 63. Part 2: Conventional TSM tactics through the state channel\n 6.4 Part 3: Member states incentivize MDB reform\n 6.5 Socialization Outcome: Comprehensive Human Rights Accountability\n7 Case 2: The Dilution of World Bank\n 7.1 Cause: Joint Transnational Social Movement activity\n 7.2 Part 1: Disruptive TSM tactics causing MDB crisis\n 7.3 Part 2: Conventional TSM tactics through the state channel\n 7.4 Interruption and breakdown of the Mechanism\n 7.5 Outcome: The Dilution of World Bank Safeguards\n 7.5.1 Obligation and Scope 1\n 7.5.2 Precision\n 7.5.3 Delegation and Scope II\n8 Analysis\n 8.1 Similar Movement Activities and Scope Conditions\n 8.2 Counter Mobilization by the World Bank Bureaucracy\n 8.3 Contested Multilateralism and the rise of China in Development Cooperation\n 8.4 Wag the Dog – The Quiescence of Liberal Member States\nConclusion\n Theoretical Implications\n Policy and Strategy Implications for Transnational Social Movements\n Liberal Democratic Mobilization and the End of U.S. Hegemony\n Engaging China\n Bolster Strong Regional Networks\n Engaging MDB Bureaucracies\n Limitations and Future Research\nReferences\nAppendix: List of Interviewees and Background Conversations