توضیحاتی در مورد کتاب Student Lives in Crisis: Deepening Inequality in Times of Austerity
نام کتاب : Student Lives in Crisis: Deepening Inequality in Times of Austerity
عنوان ترجمه شده به فارسی : زندگی دانشجویی در بحران: تعمیق نابرابری در زمان ریاضت
سری :
نویسندگان : Lorenza Antonucci
ناشر : Policy Press
سال نشر : 2016
تعداد صفحات : 226
ISBN (شابک) : 9781447318262
زبان کتاب : English
فرمت کتاب : pdf
حجم کتاب : 3 مگابایت
بعد از تکمیل فرایند پرداخت لینک دانلود کتاب ارائه خواهد شد. درصورت ثبت نام و ورود به حساب کاربری خود قادر خواهید بود لیست کتاب های خریداری شده را مشاهده فرمایید.
فهرست مطالب :
STUDENT LIVES IN CRISIS\nContents\nList of tables and figures\nList of acronyms\nNote on author\nPreface: A post-Brexit preface\nAcknowledgements\nIntroduction: Young people’s lives at university in crisis\n Student lives in crisis and the context of austerity\n The research\n Myth busting: looking at real-life experiences\n Structure of the book\nPart 1: University for all? How higher education shapes inequality among young people\n1. Social consequences of mass access in Europe\n Paradox of higher education policies: democratisation through inequality\n Features of European higher education policies: the focus on access and destination\n Students as young adults in a protracted phase of semi‑dependence\n Beyond access and destination: how young people live in university\n Conclusion\n2. How welfare influences the lives of young people in university\n Comparing ‘welfare mixes’ in England, Italy and Sweden\n Has austerity affected the welfare systems for young people in university?\n Conclusion\n3. Beyond differences? Determinants of inequality among European young people in university\n Inequality and welfare state intervention\n How relying on the family can increase inequality\n How working during university can increase inequality\n Conclusion\nPart 2: Exploring the inequality of university lives in England, Italy and Sweden\n4. Investigating young people’s semi‑dependence during university\n Researching young people in university\n Life in university as protracted semi-dependence\n Conclusion\n5. The different profiles of young people’s experiences in university\n Profile 1: Struggling and hopeless\n Profile 2: Facing difficulties, but with hope for the future\n Profile 3: Seeing university as a positive, but temporary, period\n Profile 4: Feeling good in the present, worried about the future\n Profile 5: Having a great time\n Conclusion\n6. Explaining inequality: the role of social origins and welfare sources\n ‘Struggling and hopeless’: young people without family support and working in precarious jobs\n ‘Facing difficulties, but with hope for the future’: young people in search of additional resources\n ‘A positive, but temporary, period’: students that benefited from state support\n ‘Feeling good in the present, worried about the future’: young people with (temporary) family support\n ‘Having a great time’: young people with abundant family sources and no need to work\n Conclusion: explaining inequality with social class and cross-national differences\nPart 3: The ‘eternal transition’: young adults and semi-dependence in university\n7. The family: saviour or ‘inequaliser’?\n Use of family sources by the different profiles\n Family and semi-dependence\n Conclusion\n8. The labour market contradiction: a precarious form of dependence\n How labour market participation changes across the profiles\n Why university students have different experiences of precarity\n Conclusion\n9 State: generous, conditional or absent?\n State sources and profiles\n Dependence on the state: grants and loans\n Effects of state support on young people’s dependence\n Emerging adulthood or ‘eternal semi-dependence’: the role of welfare states\n Conclusion\nConclusion: Addressing growing inequality among young people in university\n Two messages\n University was never for everybody?\n Social investment or addressing inequalities?\n European problems and national solutions?\n Inequalities and ‘Generation Y’\n Capturing the zeitgeist to change the terms of the debate\nNotes\nAnnex\n Combining Q-methodology and in-depth interviews\n Methodological procedure\nIndex