توضیحاتی در مورد کتاب The Bakassi Dispute and the International Court of Justice: Continuing Challenges
نام کتاب : The Bakassi Dispute and the International Court of Justice: Continuing Challenges
عنوان ترجمه شده به فارسی : اختلاف باکاسی و دیوان بین المللی دادگستری: چالش های مستمر
سری :
نویسندگان : Edwin E. Egede, Mark Osa Igiehon
ناشر : Routledge
سال نشر : 2016
تعداد صفحات : [193]
ISBN (شابک) : 9781472470621 , 9781317040736
زبان کتاب : English
فرمت کتاب : pdf
حجم کتاب : 2 Mb
بعد از تکمیل فرایند پرداخت لینک دانلود کتاب ارائه خواهد شد. درصورت ثبت نام و ورود به حساب کاربری خود قادر خواهید بود لیست کتاب های خریداری شده را مشاهده فرمایید.
توضیحاتی در مورد کتاب :
در 10 اکتبر 2002، دادگاه بینالمللی دادگستری تصمیم باکاسی را صادر کرد که از جمله، زمینهای غنی از منابع و قلمرو دریایی باکاسی را از نیجریه جدا کرد و عنوان قانونی آن را به کامرون منتقل کرد. این دو کشور تحت نظارت سازمان ملل مکانیسم کمیسیون مختلط کامرون و نیجریه را برای رعایت و اجرای تعهدات خود در چارچوب تصمیم ICJ ایجاد کردند. بیش از یک دهه پس از تصمیم ICJ، این جلد دانشگاهیان و متخصصان را گرد هم می آورد تا تأثیر این تصمیم و چالش ها و مسائلی را که در جریان اجرای آن مطرح شده است، ارزیابی کنند. این ارزیابی به موقع که توسط برخی به عنوان الگوی دیپلماسی پیشگیرانه و طرحی برای آینده مورد استقبال قرار می گیرد، دشواری های تحمیل چنین تصمیمات بحث برانگیزی را روشن می کند و بررسی می کند که آیا این نوع کمیسیون مختلط مکانیسم مناسبی برای اجرای آنها است یا خیر.
فهرست مطالب :
Cover
Title Page
Copyright Page
Contents
Notes on
contributors
Introduction
Notes
Chapter 1: Bakassi case: Challenges of case management of
international litigation
Introduction
The background to the case
Referral to the International Court of Justice
Choice of counsel
Interlocutory proceedings and the progress of the case before
the Court
The pleadings
The atlas
Political background
The Nigerian team
Sources of evidence
The sovereignty disputes
Effectivités
The land boundary
Maritime boundary
Offshore
Bakassi
State responsibility claims
The Court’s Judgment of 10 October 2002 and subsequent
developments
Impact of the case and subsequent jurisprudence
Notes
Chapter 2: Should Nigeria have sought revision of the Bakassi Decision by the
International Court of Justice?
Introduction
Preliminary points about revision
Requirements for revision
Newly discovered facts must be of decisive character
Absence of negligence in discovery of facts
Assessing Nigeria’s case for revision
Discovery of new facts
Principles of equity
Conclusion
Notes
Chapter 3: Resolution of international disputes through preventive diplomacy by the United Nations: Case study of the Cameroon v.
Nigeria case
Introduction
United Nations and preventive diplomacy
Case concerning the land and maritime boundary between
Cameroon and Nigeria (Bakassi)
Brief comments on the judgment
Implementation of the judgment
The anticipatory dispositions and summit
Other implementation steps by the Secretary-Generaland the two Presidents
The Greentree Agreement
The Follow-up Committee and Observer Team
The Cameroon–Nigeria Mixed Commission
Other UN agencies involved in the implementation of the judgment
The role of the Witness States
Conclusion
Notes
Chapter 4: The ICJ decision on the Cameroon–Nigeria Bakassi dispute and issues arising: A Cameroonian perspective
Introduction
Background
Reaction to the ICJ Judgment
Implementation of the Judgment and related issues
Mandate and role of the Cameroon–Nigeria Mixed Commission (CNMC)
Adoption of the Greentree Agreement
Post-conflictdevelopments and potential challenges
Fostering social cohesion among the residents in the Peninsula
Security and administration in the Peninsula
Cross-border cooperation
Conclusion: the way forward
Notes
Chpater 5:
The ICJ Bakassi Decision: The rights of the indigenous communities and populations in the Bakassi Peninsula
Introduction
Case background
Indigeneity and/or indigenousness of the peoples and communities in the Bakassi Peninsula
Indigenous ties and affinities to ancestral land: a case study of the Bakassi Peninsula
State undertakings under international law
Greentree Treaty obligations and the rights of indigenous peoples to maintain close ties and links with ancestral land
Relocation of Bakassi indigenous populations – forceful or peaceful removal from ancestral land?
Compensating displaced indigenous communities
The role of free prior informed consent (FPIC) in the furtherance of the rights of indigenous populations in the Bakassi Peninsula
Conclusion
Notes
Chapter 6:
Bakassi Decision: International law and the acquisition of sovereignty over land territory
Introduction
Framework for analysis: three paradigms concerning acquisition of territory
The traditional paradigm
The Island of Palmas paradigm
The Burkina Faso/Mali paradigm
Legal title: the validity of the Anglo-GermanAgreement of 11 March 1913
Effectivités: examination of basis of title to Bakassi advanced by Nigeria
An historical consolidation of title
Conflict between title and effectivités
Impact of the Bakassi Decision on maritime delimitation
Evaluation: change and continuity of the international law of acquisition of territory
Variable meaning of title and effectivités
Static characteristics of the Burkina Faso/Mali paradigm
Passing of sovereignty in the 2008 Malaysia/Singapore case
Conclusions
Notes
Chapter 7: The Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria (Cameroon v. Nigeria Equatorial Guinea intervening) case: Interrogating some ongoing law of the
sea challenges
Introduction
Delimitation of maritime boundary
Domestic law of the sea implications of the Bakassi case: reconfiguring Nigerian domestic maritime boundaries
Territorial sea and innocent passage of warships
Concluding remarks
Notes
Chapter 8: The ICJ Bakassi Decision: Prospects and implications for the exploitation of petroleum resources in
contested waters
Introduction
Toxic mix of maritime boundary disputes and contest for access to petroleum resources
Dispute between Somalia and Kenya over the oil-rich East African coast
Dispute between Ghana and Côte d’Ivoire over oil-rich waters
Implications of maritime boundary disputes for petroleum exploration investments in contested waters
Industry’s changing appetite for investment in contested waters
Is the Gulf of Guinea moving from disputes to cooperation and joint development?
The significance of oil concessions and licences over contested waters in maritime boundary delimitation
Oil concessions granted over disputed Bakassi waters
he ICJ’s attempt to settle the role of oil practice in maritime delimitation
Inherent contradictions and complications of ICJ’s decision on the grant of petroleum concessions over disputed waters
ITLOS vs ICJ approaches to maritime boundary delimitation –Bangladesh v. Myanmar (dispute in the Bay of Bengal) case study
Reference to the International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea (ITLOS)
The landmark ITLOS judgment
Peaceful implementation of ICJ’s Bakassi Decision as ‘good practice’ in resolving maritime boundary disputes?
Greece/Turkey delimitation dispute
Maritime delimitation in the Black Sea – Romania/Ukraine
Gulf of Guinea Commission and West Africa’s evolving practice of peacefulr esolution
Case management of maritime boundary disputes with underlying battle for petroleum resources: Nigerian–Bakassi case study
Boundary settlements which are mutually satisfactory, favourable and sustainable
ICJ’s biased judgment or Nigeria’s middling case management?
Could the Bakassi peoples by referendum have overruled the ICJ’s decision that the Bakassi Peninsula should be transferred by Nigeria to Cameroon?
Conclusion
Notes
Chapter 9: The role of a Joint Development Agreement (JDA) in resolving the conflicts and uncertainties over maritime boundary delimitat
ion: A missed opportunity in the Bakassi case
Introduction
International legal framework for maritime boundary delimitation
Dispute resolution with respect to international maritime boundaries
Some judicial authorities on delimitation
Legal basis for the adoption of a JDA
The Nigerian–Cameroon land maritime boundary dispute over theoil-rich Bakassi Peninsula
Background of Nigeria and Cameroon oil and gas industry
The Bakassi conflict
The resolution of the conflict
Disputes and uncertainties post-ICJjudgment
The joint development agreement between Nigeria and Sao Tome and Principe (STP)
JDA as an alternative in maritime boundary disputes
Conclusion
Notes
Index
توضیحاتی در مورد کتاب به زبان اصلی :
On the 10th of October 2002 the International Court of Justice delivered the Bakassi decision, which, amongst other things, excised the resource rich land and maritime territory of Bakassi from Nigeria and transferred its legal title to Cameroon. These two countries under the auspices of the United Nations established the mechanism of the Cameroon-Nigeria Mixed Commission to honour and implement their obligations under the ICJ decision. Over a decade after the ICJ decision this volume brings together academics and practitioners to assess the impact of this decision and the challenges and issues that have been raised in the course of its implementation. Hailed by some as a model of preventive diplomacy and a blueprint for the future, this timely assessment illuminates the difficulties in imposing such controversial decisions and considers whether this type of Mixed Commission is an adequate mechanism for implementing them.