دانلود کتاب The Cultural Landscape and Heritage Paradox: Protection and Development of the Dutch Archaeological-Historical Landscape and its European Dimension

فهرست مطالب :

Table of Contents\nPreface\nI. Introduction\n1. The Cultural Landscape and Heritage Paradox. Protection and Development of the Dutch Archaeological-Historical Landscape and its European Dimension\nII. Insights and Prospects of Archeological-Historical Landscape Studies\n1. Introduction to ‘Protecting and Developing the Dutch Archaeological-Historical Landscape’ (PDL/BBO)\n2. Planning the past. Lessons to be learned from ‘Protecting and Developing the Dutch Archaeological-Historical Landscape’ (PDL/BBO)\n3. Actors and orders: the shaping of landscapes and identities\nIII. Linking Knowledge and Action\n1. Linking knowledge to action: an introduction\n2. The cultural biography of landscape as a tool for action research in the Drentsche Aa National Landscape (Northern Netherlands)\n3. From inventory to identity? Constructing the Lahemaa National Park’s (Estonia) regional cultural heritage\n4. A biography of the cultural landscape in the eastern Netherlands: theory and practice of acquisition and propagation of knowledge\n5. The protection and management of the historic landscape in Scotland in the context of the European Landscape Convention\n6. Assessing in situ preservation of archaeological wetland sites by chemical analysis of botanical remains and micromorphology\n7. The ancient quarry and mining district between the Eifel and the Rhine: aims and progress of the Vulkanpark Osteifel Project\nIV. Imagination-Facts and Constructions\n1. Imagination: facts and constructions. About imagination, authenticity and identity, and the value of interpretative heritage research\n2. From Oer-IJ estuary to metropolitan coastal landscape. Assessing and preserving archaeological-historical resources from 4000 years of living between land and water\n3. Two sorting-machines for the Oer-IJ\n4. Images, attitudes and measures in the field of cultural heritage in Norway\n5. The good, the bad and the self-referential. Heritage planning and the productivity of difference\n6. Interpretative heritage research and the politics of democratization and de-democratization. As illustrated by the plight of hard-working amateurs in the trenches of revamped policy arrangements\n7. Past pictures. Landscape visualization with digital tools\n8. Gazing at places we have never been. Landscape, heritage and identity. A comment on Jörg Rekittke & Philip Paar: ‘Past Pictures. Landscape visualization with digital tools’\n9. ‘Green’ and ‘blue’ developments. Prospects for research and conservation of early prehistoric hunter-gatherer landscapes\n10. Presentation, appreciation and conservation of liminal landscapes: challenges from an Irish perspective (in response to the contribution by Bjørn Smit)\n11. My Story – your Story: three levels for reflecting and debating the relationship between contemporary archaeological heritage management and the public. A comment from Germany\nV. Sharing Knowledge-Stories, Maps and Design\n1. Introduction: sharing knowledge - stories, maps and design\n2. Revitalizing history: moving from historical landscape reconstructions to heritage practices in the southern Netherlands\n3. The role of historical expertise in today’s heritage management, landscape development and spatial planning\n4. The potential of remote sensing, magnetometry and geochemical prospection in the characterization and inspection of archaeological sites and landscapes in the Netherlands\n5. New developments in archaeological predictive modelling\n6. Cultural heritage in environmental impact assessment – reflections from England and northwest Europe\n7. On the necessity of congruent meanings in archaeological heritage management. An analysis of three case studies from a policy science perspective\n8. Protection and management of Spanish archaeological-historical landscapes. Possibilities and perspectives for the application of a protective and developmental approach\n9. Knowledge and legal action: a plea for conservation. Comment on ‘Protection and management of Spanish archaeological-historical landscapes. Possibilities and perspectives for the application of a protective and developmental approach’ by María Ruiz del Árbol & Almudena Orejas\nVI. Synthesis and Conclusions\nWhat have we learnt?\nVII. Management of Knowledge\n1. The management of knowledge for integrative landscape research: an introduction\n2. Elephant and Delta. In search of practical guidelines for interdisciplinary and strategic research\n3. LANDMARKS. A project based on transnational and interdisciplinary scientific co-operation\n4. The Planarch experience\n5. Management of knowledge within the international and intersectoral research project ‘Cultural Landscapes\n6. ‘Changing Landscapes’: an interdisciplinary Danish research centre\n7. The PDL/BBO research programme analysed from the perspective of knowledge management\n8. Cultural landscapes in the mirror. What information systems reveal about information management and cultural landscape research\nVIII. Agenda for the Future\n1. Agenda for the future. What do we see and what do we take?\n2. Heritage policy in spatial planning\n3. Changing landscapes of archaeology and heritage\nIX. Summary\nX. Appendix\n1. List of selected abbreviations\n2. Glossary of specific subject-related concepts and terms used in this book\n3. Protecting and Developing the Dutch Archaeological-Historical Landscape/Bodemarchief in Behoud en Ontwikkeling (PDL/BBO): projects and programmes\n4. List of authors, fields of activity and addresses\nSubject index\nIndex of places and regions