توضیحاتی در مورد کتاب The EU Better Regulation Agenda: A Critical Assessment
نام کتاب : The EU Better Regulation Agenda: A Critical Assessment
عنوان ترجمه شده به فارسی : دستور کار مقررات بهتر اتحادیه اروپا: یک ارزیابی انتقادی
سری : Modern Studies in European Law
نویسندگان : Sacha Garben, Inge Govaere (editors)
ناشر : Hart Publishing
سال نشر : 2018
تعداد صفحات : 257
ISBN (شابک) : 9781509917334 , 9781509917341
زبان کتاب : English
فرمت کتاب : pdf
حجم کتاب : 5 مگابایت
بعد از تکمیل فرایند پرداخت لینک دانلود کتاب ارائه خواهد شد. درصورت ثبت نام و ورود به حساب کاربری خود قادر خواهید بود لیست کتاب های خریداری شده را مشاهده فرمایید.
فهرست مطالب :
Contents\nPart I: Introduction and State of Play\n 1. The Multi-faceted Nature of Better Regulation\n A Semi-permanent Yet Dynamic Feature of EU Law and Policy\n Democratic and Constitutional Legitimacy Questions\n The Various Narratives Underlying the EU Better Regulation Agenda\n The Quality of the Better Regulation Debate\n Structure of the Book\n Conclusion\n 2. Integrating Regulatory Governance and Better Regulation as Reflexive Governance\n Introduction\n Better Regulation: Regulatory Governance and Reflexive Governance\n Reflexive Governance and Better Regulation\n Better Regulation as Reflexive Governance in the EU\n Conclusions\nPart II: A Critical Assessment of the Main Elements of the Better Regulation Agenda\n 3. Improving the Quality of EU Legislation\n What is Good EU Legislation: The Theory\n What is Good EU Legislation: EU Instruments?\n What is Good Transposing Legislation?\n Conclusions: What on Earth is Really Wrong and How to Change it\n 4. Cost-Benefit Analysis and EU Policy\n CBA and Public Policy: A Never-Ending Academic Debate\n CBA and the EU Better Regulation Agenda\n Towards Convergence between ex ante Impact Assessment and ex post Evaluation Methods in the EU?\n 5. The Better Regulation Agenda and the Deactivation of EU Competences\n Introduction: The Prevalent Notion of \'Ever Closer Union\'?\n Restoring Tasks to Member States: The Conceptual Framework with the Emphasis on the Deactivation of Competences\n The Position of Deactivation in the Framework of the Better Regulation Agenda\n The Better Regulation Agenda and the Deactivation of EU Competences: Empirical Evidence\n Conclusion\nPart III: Views from EU Institutional Practice\n 6. The European Commission and its Better Regulation Agenda\n Introduction\n The Origins of Evidence-Based Policy-Making and the Three Pillars of Better Regulation\n The Past Revisited\n A New Impulse for Better Regulation: The Juncker Commission\n Challenges and Myths\n Is Better Regulation a Left-over from a Bygone Era?\n A Few Concluding Remarks\n 7. The European Parliament and the Better Law-Making Agenda\n What is it All About?\n The IIA and the Interinstitutional Balance\n Influencing the Political Agenda: Legislative Programming\n Could it Have Done Less?\n 8. The Council\n Introduction\n The Historical Road to the Adoption of the 2003 Interinstitutional Agreement on Better Law-Making and its Heritage\n Some Examples from the Council\'s Most Recent Legislative Practice for Better Regulation after Lisbon, Demonstrating Good Inter-institutional Cooperation\n The New IIA on Better Law-Making: The Content and a First Brief Assessment\n Conclusions\n 9. The Member States and the Better Regulation Agenda\n Introduction: Better Regulation Intentions towards the Member States by the Juncker Commission\n Reality Check: More than One Way?\n Member States and the \'Origin\' of Better Regulation\n The Member States in the Mandelkern Report\n Subsidiarity\n Member States\' \'Implementation\' of Better Regulation\n Regulatory Policy in Belgium\n Regulatory Policy in Flanders\n The Role of Member States in the EU\'s Better Regulation Debates\n The Flemish/Belgian Participation in the EU\'s Better Regulation Debates\n Some Final Comments\n 10. From Better Regulation to Better Adjudication?\n Introduction\n Impact Assessment, the Rule of Law and the Better Regulation Agenda\n Impact Assessment in the Court\'s Review: The Rise of Procedural Proportionality\n Better Regulation as Better Adjudication? Comparing and Improving the Use of IAs\n Juridification and Constitutional Limits\n Conclusion\nPart IV: Broader Perspectives on the Better Regulation Agenda\n 11. Eurolegalism and the Better Regulation Agenda\n Introduction\n Why EU Regulation is Detailed and Prescriptive\n Better Regulation as a Failed Public Relations Exercise\n Conclusion\n 12. An \'Impact Assessment\' of EU Better Regulation\n Introduction\n Definition of the Problem(s)\n The Effectiveness of Better Regulation in Solving the Identified Problem(s) Compared to Alternative Policy Options\n The Costs and Benefits of EU Better Regulation\n Conclusion\nIndex