دانلود کتاب The Legacies of Institutionalisation: Disability, Law and Policy in the ‘Deinstitutionalised’ Community

فهرست مطالب :

Acknowledgements\nContents\nNotes on Contributors\nIntroduction: The Lasting Legacies of Institutionalisation: Questioning\rLaw’s Roles in the Emancipation of People with Disabilities\n The Lasting Legacies of Institutionalisation\n Legitimating Institutionalisation’s Legacies: Considering Law’s Longstanding Violence\n Considering the Promise of the Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities\n Aim and Structure of the Collection\nPART ONE: POWER DYNAMICS THAT SHAPE THE CONDITIONS AND POSSIBILITIES OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES WITHIN AND BEYOND SITES OF PHYSICAL CONFINEMENT\n 1. Navigating Mental Health Tribunals as a Mad-identifi ed Layperson:\rAn Autoethnographical Account of Liminality\n Setting the Scene: Diary Entry, 10 June 2010\n Diary Entry, 10 June 2010\n Diary Entry, 10 June 2010\n Diary Entry, 10 June 2010\n Diary Entry, 10 June 2010\n 2. The ‘Will to Empower’ in Contemporary Mental Health Practice\n Rights and technologies of governance\n Deinstitutionalisation and rights-based mental health laws\n Self-care, empowerment and recovery\n Coercion and recovery in mental health law\n Conclusion\n 3. The Biopolitics of Disability in Late Francoism and the Spanish\rDemocratic Transition (1959–81)\n A New Need for Labour: The Economic Sphere\n Correcting Bodies: The Medical Sphere\n Educating Disability: The Educational Sphere\n Final Remarks\n 4. Disability Law in Spain: Moving Forward Towards Full Citizenship\rand Inclusion?\n A Segregated Education System\n Two Types of Access to Employment\n A System for the Provision of Supports and Care that Favours Institutionalisation\n Conclusions\n 5. Accommodation in the Academy: Working with Episodic\rDisabilities and Living In Between\n The University as an Institution\n Episodic Disabilities and the ‘In Between’\n Barriers to Accommodation\n Challenging Academia’s Logics and Legacies: Reimagining Accommodations\n 6. Disabling Solitary: An Anti-Carceral Critique of Canada’s Solitary Confinement Litigation\n Canada\'s Solitary Confinement Litigation\n Three Worries (Carceral Resilience)\n Conclusion\nPART TWO: COMPLICATED ALLIANCES: THE CONFLUENCE\rOF ABLEIST, SANIST, GENDERED, CLASSED AND\rRACIALISED LOGICS IN LAW, POLICY AND PRACTICE\n 7. Excavating Hostility and Rationalising Violence through Anti-immigrant Confluent Discourses of Racial Threat, Risk, Burden and Lack\n Anti-Immigration Discourses Within Brexit and Trump\n Historiographies of Populism, Nationalism and Eugenics\n Confluences of Colonial Eugenics and Racist Ableism, an Excavated Esprit de Corps\n 8. Disability–Indigenous Gendered Relations in Settler–Colonial\rAustralia: Continuities, Trajectories and Enmeshments\n Disability Neoliberal Poverty Management Regimes: Disability Poverty Mobilities\n Mobilities Of Indigenous - Disability Poverty Management\n Gendering Indigenous-Disability Neoliberal Mobilities\n Acknowledgements\n 9. Disability, Gender and Institutions: An Examination of\rAustralian Cases Involving Personality Disorders\n Personality Disorders in Australian Case Law\n Conclusion\n Acknowledgements\n 10. Reconciling Cognitive Disability and Corrosive Social Disadvantage:\rIdentity, Transgression and Debility\n Jack\n Casey\n Disability as volatility\n Debility: A Biopolitical Account of Disability and Disadvantage?\n Conclusion\n 11. Fixated Persons Units: A Disability Studies and Critical Race\rTheory (DisCrit) Analysis\n Background to Fixated Persons Units\n Simultaneously Engaging Disability Studies and Critical Race Theory (Discrit)\n Overt and Covert Collusions: Pathologisation, Racialisation and Criminalisation\n From ‘Pre-Crime’ to ‘Pre-Diagnosis’ by the Criminal Justice and Mental Health Systems\n Policing and ‘Disordering’ Political Dissent and Structural Disadvantage\n Conclusion\nPART THREE: INSTITUTIONALISATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS:\rTHE ROLE OF THE CRPD IN THE EMANCIPATION\rOF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES\n 12. A Matter of Engagement: Analysing the Submissions to the CRPD\rCommittee on General Comment #1\n Overview of the Submissions\n The Fundamental Divide: For or Against a Strong Reading of the CRPD\n The Governments\' View of International Human Rights Law\n Existing Human Rights\n Opinio Juris, Domestic Law and Inertia\n Conclusion\n 13. Making Sense of Cheshire West\n Coding \'Deprivation of Liberty\'\n Cheshire West: The Facts\n Were MIG, MEG or P Deprived of Liberty?\n Deprivation of Liberty in the Post-Carceral Era\n 14. The Production of ‘Dependent Individuals’ Within the Application\rof Spanish Law 39/2006 on Personal Autonomy and Dependent Care\rin Andalusia, Basque Country and Madrid\n Legislation and assistance for dependency\n Dependency vs Autonomy\n The 39/2006 Law in Practice\n Critical Analysis\n Conclusion\n 15. To Use or Not to Use Physical Restraints in Paediatric Psychiatric\rCare: Should Health Professionals as Guarantors Use Coercive\rMeasures to Protect from Potential Harm?\n CRPD and Spanish Legislation – Differential Considerations in Relation to Physical Restraint\n Health Professionals\' Legal Responsibility in Relation to Physical Restraint According to the CRPD and Spanish Legislation\n Two Conflicting Duties: To Protect from Risk of Harm Using Physical Restraint Versus to Protect from Punishment, Ill-Treatment and Torture by not Using Physical Restraint\n Legal Recommendations\n 16. Scottish Mental Health and Capacity Law: Replacing the Old with\rthe New or the Old in Policy, Law and Practice?\n Human Rights and Scotland\'s Mental Health and Capacity Law\n Conclusion\n 17. Diffabled People’s Access to Indonesia’s Criminal Justice System\n The Medical and Social Models of Disability\n The Barriers Facing Diffabled People in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System\n The Role of Civil Society Organisations in Improving Access for Diffabled People\n Conclusion\nIndex