دانلود کتاب The New Sound of Indo-European: Essays in Phonological Reconstruction

فهرست مطالب :

Preface\nList of Contributors\nI. Opening remarks\nComments on reconstructions in historical linguistics\nReconstruction and historical linguistics [Discussion of Koerner’s paper]\nII. Laryngeal Theory\nThe nature of the Proto-Indo-European laryngeals\nThe Laryngeal Theory and the phonology of Prehistoric Greek\nLaryngeal metathesis: An Aryan peculiarity?\nAgainst a Proto-Indo-European phoneme *a\nMonophthongizations: More plausible than laryngeals!\nDiscussions of papers on Laryngeal Theory\nOn (the nature of) Proto-Indo-European laryngeals [Discussion of Bammesberger’s and Beekes’s papers]\nRemarks on R. S. P. Beekes, ‘The nature of the Proto-Indo-European laryngeals’\nIII. Glottalic Theory\nHistorical Italic phonology in typological perspective\nLachmann’s law\nPhonological and morphological consequences of the ‘Glottalic Theory’\nLanguage typology and Indo-European reconstruction\nSound change typology and the ‘Ejective Model’\nNeue Forschungen zur germanischen Lautverschiebung – ein Fall von Paradigmenwechsel?\nDie Tenues Aspiratae: Dreiteilung oder Vierteilung des indogermanischen Plosivsystems und die Konsequenzen dieser Frage für die Chronologie einer Glottalreihe\nTowards a characterization of the Proto-Indo-European sound system\nThe Indo-European obstruent features and phonotactic constraints\nDiscussions of papers on Glottalic Theory\nLatin phonology and the ‘Glottalic Model’ [Discussion of Baldi – Johnston-Staver’s, Kortlandt’s, and Vennemann’s papers]\nRemarks on Baldi – Johnston-Staver, ‘Historical Italic phonology in typological perspective’\nRemarks on F. Kortlandt, ‘Lachmann’s law’\nLetter to Theo Vennemann\nReply to Claude Boisson’s remarks\nRemarks on T. V. Gamkrelidze, ‘Language typology and Indo-European reconstruction’\nIndo-European consonant shifts – Algebra, arithmetic, or normal science? [Discussion of Job’s and Schrodt’s papers]\nRemarks on J. E. Rasmussen, ‘Die Tenues Aspiratae: Dreiteilung oder Vierteilung des indogermanischen Plosivsystems und die Konsequenzen dieser Frage für die Chronologie einer Glottalreihe’\nErwiderung auf Paul J. Hoppers ‘Remarks’\n‘Das Arlbergmodell’ – ein Diskussionsbeitrag\nLettre aux participants de l’Atelier sur l’indo-européen du Congrès de Pavie\nIV. Concluding remarks\nNotes on the Workshop: Reconstructions of the Proto-Indo-European sound system and their consequences\nIndex of forms\nIndex of names