دانلود کتاب The Power of Place in Play: A Bourdieusian Analysis of Auckland Children's Seasonal Play Practices

فهرست مطالب :

Cover\nTable of contents\nAbstract\n Keywords\nAcknowledgements\nPrologue\n1. ‘Playing around’ with children’s outdoor play\n Embeddings: the URBAN study\n Aim\n Research questions\n Placing ‘obesogenic landscapes’\n Moving beyond passive participation with children’s geographies\n Defining ‘play’ and ‘physical activity’: two sides of the same coin?\n Conceptualising ‘environmental literacy’\n An attempt to define neighbourhood\n Thesis overview\n2. ‘Obesogenic landscapes’ in children’s geographies: mapping key debates and perspectives\n Urban children’s outdoor play insights from ‘obesogenic landscapes’\n The ‘home’ environment as ‘obesogenic landscape’\n Neighbourhoods in light of ‘obesogenic landscapes’\n Transcending home and neighbourhood environments: playing between ‘domestication’, ‘institutionalisation’ and ‘insularisation’\n Shaping ‘obesogenic landscapes’: experiencing seasonality and weather conditions\n Conclusion\n3. A conceptual framework for understanding children’s seasonal outdoor play: Bourdieu and affordances\n Bourdieu’s key concepts: field, capital and habitus\n Bourdieu’s understanding of a ‘field’\n Symbolic capital: structuring the ‘field of play’\n Habitus: transcending the individual actor\n A Bourdieusian lens on space and place\n The inhabited or appropriated space\n The space of points of view\n Complementing the Bourdieusian lens with ‘affordances’\n Introducing and extending the concept of affordances\n Potential and actualised affordances\n Affordances and the neighbourhood environment\n An emotionalisation of affordances\n The social side of affordances\n Conclusion\n4. ‘Methodological principles’: a Bourdieusian approach to unpack outdoor play\n Applying Bourdieu’s ‘methodological principles’: transcending the ‘existing’ paradigm divide\n The construction of the research object\n A three-level approach to studying the field and the object of research\n Participant objectivation\n Bourdieu, mixed-method research and children\n Near and distant multi-sited participatory ethnography: moving beyond passive participation\n Conclusion\n5. The research practice: procedural principles\n Recruiting families\n Placing families\n The research practice: introducing the methods\n Researcher’s method: neighbourhood walks\n Procedural principles of methods conducted with parents\n Parental pen and paper survey\n Parental interview\n Procedural principles of methods conducted with children\n Preparations: decisions on GPS logger and a pilot study\n GPS: observing through distant ethnography\n Travel diary\n Elicited drawings\n Semi-structured interviews with children\n Beyond passive participation: children in the driver’s seat of a ‘follow up study’\n The analysis stage\n Analysis stage I: Considering the data separately\n Near ethnography: analysing the semi-structured interviews\n Analysis of visual data: viewing near and distant ethnography through the same lens\n Near and distant ethnography analysed through descriptive statistics\n Analysis stage II: coming to terms with near and distant ethnography through triangulation\n Conclusion\n6. Locating Auckland Central and Beach Haven\n Auckland’s climate and weather\n ‘A localisation’ of Auckland\n Locating Beach Haven\n Locating the Central City\n Conclusion\n7. The social history of play: Auckland a city of managed childhood?\n Shanghais and tea parties: paradoxes of the (un)managed childhood of the early days\n Meaningful pastime: supervising children’s free time in the Beginning of modernity and war times\n Play and well-being in the post-war period: the suburban nuclear family\n Children’s play and the feminist movement\n Pluralism or individualisation of play? Neoliberal tolls on children’s play\n Conclusion\n8. The inhabitation of Auckland Central and Beach Haven: a parental pursuit\n Structuring the appropriation of Auckland Central and Beach Haven\n Beach Haven: attracting the undesired?\n Auckland Central: attracting only foreigners?\n Conclusion\n9. ‘Profits of localisation’ for outdoor play in Auckland Central and Beach Haven\n Children’s map-able roaming patterns\n Viewing children’s roaming patterns from distance\n Play patterns in Auckland Central and Beach Haven\n Families’ views of ‘desirable agents and goods’ and their promising ‘symbolic capital’\n Children and their home environment\n Dealing with urban mobilities: managing traffic volumes\n Desiring organised pastimes: the ‘institutionalisation’ of play\n Trust, social networks and neighbourliness: determinants of outdoor play and ‘environmental literacy’?\n ‘Profits of localisation’: valued destinations in Beach Haven and the central city\n Conclusion\n10. Spaces of points of view: the logics of outdoor play in summer and winter\n Outdoor play and the ‘practical logics’ in actualising affordances\n Attitudes towards children playing in a central city and suburban environment\n The practical logics of families’ schedules: managing business\n Maximising children’s well-being: seasonal ‘rules of the game’\n Two perspectives of play: evaluating children’s development\n Managing children: minimising ‘risks’ of outdoor play\n The emotional aspects of outdoor play: practical logics of experiences\n Habitus and seasonal outdoor play\n Inheriting a certain type of playing?\n Playing naturally: embodied play practices\n “I am a wild outdoor one”: an outdoor play habitus\n Hibernation of the outdoor play habitus\n Curtailing the outdoor play habitus: prioritising the ‘safety paradigm’\n Conclusion\n11. Struggles in the ‘field of play’: five insights into understanding and explaining ‘obesogenic landscapes’\n Making the most of Beach Haven: stories of an outdoor tomboy\n Limits in Beach Haven? Curtailing the outdoor habitus\n Making the most of the central city: stories of a sports ‘enthusiast’\n Adjusting a passion for active play to the central city: stories of a gamer\n Coming out of hibernation: the suburban paradox\n Conclusion\n12. Closing, refurbishing and re-opening the ‘play grounds’ of ‘obesogenic landscapes’\n Closing and refurbishing the thesis’ ‘play grounds’ of ‘obesogenic landscapes’\n Sustainable living ideologies: necessarily ‘obesogenic landscapes’ for children?\n Seasonality: transcending localities\n Historical conditions: the passing on of the habitus\n Working with, against and beyond Bourdieu: methodological and theoretical ‘play grounds’\n Future playgrounds for researching ‘obesogenic landscapes’\n Concluding remarks\nReferences