دانلود کتاب Through the Mirrors of Science: New Challenges for Knowledge-based Societies

فهرست مطالب :

Foreword\nSection one\n 0 Introduction: From the Age of “Posts” to the Knowledge Society\n 0.1 – Beyond the age of “Posts”\n 0.2 – Post-industrial and post-modern\n 0.3 – The knowledge economy and the knowledge society\n 0.3.1 – Vannevar Bush and the consequences of his approach\n 0.3.2 – A new metamorphosis of “capital”\n 0.4 – The “knowledge” of the society of knowledge\n 1 In the Beginning there was Lisbon\n 1.1. Old Europe needs to wake up\n 1.1.1 – The roots of the “Lisbon Strategy”\n 1.1.2 – The reasoning behind the worries\n 1.2 – The development of the Lisbon Strategy\n 1.2.1 – The close union of economics and research\n 1.2.2 – Human capital – beyond the economy\n 1.2.3 – The economic requirements for innovation\n 1.3 – Beyond GDP: the environmental turn\n 1.3.1 – The unheroic history of GDP\n 1.3.2 – Europa towards sustainable development\n 1.4 – Keep on trying once again, old Europe!\n 2 Society, Democracy and Trust in Science\n 2.1 – Science, democracy and society in the history of modern culture\n 2.2 – Public opinion and science\n 2.3 – Divulgation and communication of science\n 2.3.1 – The many facets of a relationship\n 2.3.2 – The “construction“ of the public\n 2.3.3 – The “construction” of the object\n 2.4 – The interaction between the public and science\n 2.4.1 – “Hybrid forums”\n 2.4.2 – “Civic epistemologies”\n 2.5 – The value of democracy in science\nSection two\n 3 Historical, Philosophical and Sociological Models of the Interaction between Science and Society\n 3.1 – The twentieth-century philosophical Received-View of science\n 3.2 – Philosophy and sociology of science I: a division of labour\n 3.3 – Philosophy and sociology of science II: the historicist turn\n 3.4 – Post-Mertonian sociology of science\n 3.5 – The emergence of “Science and Technological Studies”\n 3.6 – STS and science policy\n 4 From the Descriptive to the Normative: a Multidisciplinary Approach for Descriptively-Informed Science Policy\n 4.1 – Multidisciplinary versus interdisciplinary integration of STS’s methodological variation\n 4.2 – Modelling techno-science complexity for science policy\n 4.3 – Beyond theory and observation: the Modeling Approach to Science (MAS)\n 4.4 – Towards a descriptively-informed science policy\n 4.5 – Further articulating MAS\n 4.5.1 – Levels of analysis of theory-formation\n 4.5.2 – MAS and “methodological tolerance”\n 4.6 – From descriptive to normative STS: heuristic appraisal\n 5 Implementing New Strategies: Towards the Recommendations\n 5.1 – Frontier research: beyond economic growth\n 5.1.1 – The linear model of techno-scientific innovation and economic growth\n 5.1.2 – Alternative models of techno-scientific innovation and how they fail to meet general society needs\n 5.2 – Tacit knowledge and expertise\n 5.2.1 – The representation of tacit knowledge\n 5.2.2 – The possible explications of tacit knowledge\n 5.2.3 – Society, tacit knowledge and knowledge-based view\n 5.2.4 – Models of expertise\n 5.2.5 – Expertise, tacit knowledge, complexity of knowledge\n 5.3 – The importance of creativity\n 5.3.1 – Creativity and the creative person\n 5.3.2 – Family and school\n 5.3.3 – Companies\n 5.3.4 – Widespread creativity\n 5.4 – The role of the university in the society of knowledge\n 5.4.1 – University potential and problems\n 5.4.2 – The European Paradox\n 5.4.3 – The contradictions of research\n 5.4.4 – A diverse view of contemporary research\n 5.4.5 – A comparison with the Humboldt model\n 5.4.6 – What is the mission of today’s universities?\n 5.5 – Not only specialisation: towards a more integrated vision of culture\n 5.5.1 – A more comphensive vision of knowledge\n 5.5.2 – Overcoming hyper-specialization\n 5.5.3 – Towards superseding old dualisms\n 5.6 – Towards an industrial or a humanistic scenario?\nConclusion: The Recommendations to the European Commission\nREFERENCES\nACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS