توضیحاتی در مورد کتاب Values in the Supreme Court: Decisions, Division and Diversity
نام کتاب : Values in the Supreme Court: Decisions, Division and Diversity
عنوان ترجمه شده به فارسی : ارزش ها در دیوان عالی: تصمیمات، تقسیم و تنوع
سری :
نویسندگان : Rachel J Cahill-O’Callaghan
ناشر : Hart Publishing
سال نشر : 2020
تعداد صفحات : 231
ISBN (شابک) : 9781509921850 , 9781509921874
زبان کتاب : English
فرمت کتاب : pdf
حجم کتاب : 4 مگابایت
بعد از تکمیل فرایند پرداخت لینک دانلود کتاب ارائه خواهد شد. درصورت ثبت نام و ورود به حساب کاربری خود قادر خواهید بود لیست کتاب های خریداری شده را مشاهده فرمایید.
فهرست مطالب :
Foreword\nPrologue: Setting the Parameters\nAcknowledgements\nContents\nDefinitions\nTable of Cases\nTable of Legislation\n1. A Theoretical Framework for a Role of Values in Judicial Decisions\n I. Judicial Discretion and the Exercise of Choice in Uncertain Decisions\n II. Defining Values\n III. A Foundation for the Role of Values, Uncertainty and Intuition in Judicial Decision Making\n IV. Evidence of Instinct and Values in the Supreme Court\n V. Constraint on the Influence of Values\n2. Finding Values in Legal Judgments:A Model and a Method\n I. A Psychological Model of Personal Values\n II. A Note on the Selection of Judgments: Hard Cases in the UK Supreme Court\n III. A Method to Identify Values in Legal Judgments\n IV. Values in Legal Judgments - Examples\n V. Limits of the Coding Scheme\n3. The Value:Decision Paradigm: Validating the Method\n I. The Case - R (on the Application of E) v JFS Governing Body [2009]\n II. Are the Values Affirmed by Opposing Decisions Reflective of Intrinsic Personal Values? The Experiment\n4. Does the Value:Decision Paradigm Apply to all Indeterminate Cases? Division, Dissent and Judicial Values\n I. Defining Dissent and Division\n II. Division in the UK Supreme Court\n III. What Motivates Dissent?\n IV. The Psychology of Dissent\n V. Case Selection and Analysis\n VI. Values in Cases which Divided Judicial Opinion\n VII. Values, Division and the Subject Matter of the Case\n VIII. The Value:Decision Paradigm in Cases with a Single Dissent\n IX. Concurring Judgments in Consensus Decisions - Another Form of Disagreement\n X. Division, Dissent, Uncertainty and Values\n5. Values and Individual Decision Making: Diversity of Values and Consistency in Decisions\n I. The Role of the Individual in Judicial Decisions\n II. Individual Difference - Tacit Diversity in Judicial Decision Making\n III. Diversity of Values in the Supreme Court\n IV. Values Priorities Reflected in Judicial Decisions\n V. The Value:Decision Paradigm in Individual Legal Decision Making\n VI. Individual Values and Decisions\n6. Values and Panel Decision Making: Shared Value Priorities and Agreement in Hard Cases\n I. Agreement in the UK Supreme Court\n II. Calculating Agreement in the Supreme Court\n III. Shared Judicial Value Priorities\n IV. Values and Agreement in Cases which Divide Judicial Opinion\n V. Values and Agreement in the Supreme Court\n7. The Role of Values in Judicial Decision Making in the UK Supreme Court\n I. Transparency\n II. Judicial Diversity\n III. Judicial Appointment\nReferences\nIndex